General movement based therapy to support neurodevelopment of preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial

Anna Badura1, Annika Dietz2, Florian Zeman3

  • 1Department of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital Regensburg (KUNO), Hospital St. Hedwig of the Order of St. John of God, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Anna.badura@barmherzige-regensburg.de.

Pediatric Research
|January 9, 2026
PubMed

Insights

This study found that a parent-led General Movement (GM) intervention did not significantly improve neurodevelopment or parental mental health in very preterm infants. However, the approach showed promise for infants with early neurodevelopmental challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal care
  • Developmental pediatrics
  • Rehabilitation medicine

Background:

  • Preterm birth (before 32 weeks gestation) is linked to neurodevelopmental impairments.
  • Early intervention is crucial for improving outcomes in high-risk infants.
  • General Movement (GM) based interventions are a potential therapeutic approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a parent-led GM intervention for very preterm infants.
  • To evaluate the impact of GM intervention on infant neurodevelopment and parental mental health.
  • To explore the role of GM therapy in mitigating neurodevelopmental risks associated with preterm birth.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, randomized-controlled trial involving very preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks or birth weight <1500g).
  • Intervention group received 10 weeks of parent-led GM treatment (3x daily) starting at 34 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), with telehealth support.
  • Control group received standard care. Neurodevelopment was assessed until 2 years corrected age; parental mental health and biomarkers were secondary outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Sixty-six infants were randomized (32 control, 34 intervention).
  • No significant differences were found between groups in neurodevelopmental outcomes or parental mental health.
  • A notable observation was that all three infants in the intervention group with initial poor neuromotor features achieved good neurodevelopment at follow-up.

Conclusions:

  • Parent-led GM intervention is feasible and well-received in very preterm infants.
  • While overall outcomes were similar, the intervention may benefit infants showing early signs of neurodevelopmental difficulties.
  • Further research is needed to optimize participant selection and adherence for GM-based therapies in preterm populations.
Abstract