Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

07:59
Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
Published on: September 7, 2018
12.0K
Fat Content Quantification with US Attenuation Coefficient: Phantom Correlation with MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction.
Rongying Chen1, Genglin Zhang2, Jie Zeng1
1Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 10, 2026
Summary
This study shows ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC) measurements are consistent across devices for assessing fat concentration. A conversion formula was developed linking ultrasound AC to MRI-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF).
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Ultrasound Technology
- Biophysics
Background:
- Accurate quantification of tissue fat concentration is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring various medical conditions.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) provides a reliable measure of fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), but its accessibility can be limited.
- Ultrasound (US) offers a more portable and cost-effective imaging modality, with its attenuation coefficient (AC) showing potential for fat quantification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the consistency and reproducibility of attenuation coefficient (AC) measurements using different commercial ultrasound (US) devices.
- To investigate the relationship between US-derived AC values and MRI-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF).
- To derive a conversion equation for estimating fat concentration from US AC measurements.
Main Methods:
- Twelve phantoms with varying fat proportions (0-100%) were created.
- Attenuation coefficients (AC) were measured using three commercial ultrasound systems: attenuation imaging (ATI), ultrasound attenuation analysis (USAT), and US-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP).
- MRI-PDFF measurements were obtained for comparison, and linear correlation analysis was performed to establish relationships and derive a conversion formula.
Main Results:
- Ultrasound AC measurements demonstrated high consistency and reproducibility, with inter- and intra-operator intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.989 to 0.995.
- Significant linear relationships were found between ultrasound attenuation parameters and phantom fat concentration (r = 0.938-0.986) and between ultrasound attenuation parameters and MRI-PDFF values (r = 0.922-0.982).
- A conversion formula was derived: US (dB/cm/MHz) = 0.501 + 0.012 MRI-PDFF (%) for fat proportions ≤ 50%.
Conclusions:
- Commercial ultrasound devices show significant diagnostic value for quantifying fat concentrations with good consistency.
- The established linear relationship between ultrasound AC and MRI-PDFF supports the development of a practical conversion formula.
- This research paves the way for wider clinical application of ultrasound in non-invasive fat quantification.

