Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 30, 2026

qPCR Is a Sensitive and Rapid Method for Detection of Cytomegaloviral DNA in Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded Biopsy Tissue
Published on: July 9, 2014
The Use of CSF Multiplex PCR Panel in Patients with Viral Uveitis
Young Hwan Jeong1,2, Su Hwan Park3,4, Seung Min Lee3,4
1Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of ocular fluids is an essential diagnostic method for identifying infectious causes of uveitis. However, multiplex PCR kits specifically developed for ophthalmic use are not commercially available in many regions, including Korea. Given the biochemical similarity between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and aqueous humor, this study evaluated the diagnostic utility of a commercially available CSF multiplex PCR panel for detecting herpesviruses in patients with suspected viral uveitis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients whose aqueous humor samples were analyzed using a multiplex PCR assay originally designed for CSF testing (Seeplex Meningitis-V1 ACE Detection kit, Seegene, Seoul, Republic of Korea). The samples were obtained between May 2019 and June 2023 at two tertiary referral hospitals. The assay targeted herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1, HSV-2), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6). Patients were classified into three groups: (I) anterior uveitis with suspected herpesviral infection, (II) acute retinal necrosis (ARN), and (III) CMV retinitis. Baseline characteristics, PCR positivity rates, and virus prevalence were compared among the groups. Results: Among 149 eyes tested, 86 were included in the final analysis. The overall positivity rate was 38.4%. PCR positivity was 19.7% (12/61) in Group I, 93.8% (15/16) in Group II, and 66.7% (6/9) in Group III. CMV was the most common pathogen in Groups I (66.7%) and III (100%), while VZV was predominant in Group II (80%). No HHV-6 infection was detected. Conclusions: The positivity rate in anterior uveitis (Group I) was lower than previously reported, likely due to the limited sample volume relative to the assay's requirement. Nevertheless, the assay demonstrated diagnostic reliability comparable to previous reports for ARN and CMV retinitis. Therefore, the CSF-based multiplex PCR panel serves as a feasible and cost-effective diagnostic option for sight-threatening posterior segment infections, facilitating prompt diagnosis and treatment, although further optimization is warranted for anterior uveitis.

