Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Characterizing Novel Enzymes from Extremophiles and Common Pathogens to Understand DNA Repair and Replication
Published on: July 5, 2024
The Chimeric Nuclease SpRYc Exhibits Highly Variable Performance Across Biological Systems.
Irina O Deriglazova1, Mikhail V Shepelev2, Natalia A Kruglova2
1Department of the Control of Genetic Processes, Institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 34/5 Vavilova Str., Moscow 119334, Russia.
The novel SpRYc CRISPR system offers broader PAM targeting but shows variable editing efficiency across different cell types and organisms. Locus-specific validation is crucial for these PAM-relaxed genome editing tools.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genome Engineering
- Biotechnology
Background:
- CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing is powerful but limited by protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) requirements.
- PAM-relaxed nucleases, like SpRYc, aim to expand targeting capabilities.
- Understanding SpRYc's performance across diverse systems is essential for its application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the genome editing activity and PAM compatibility of the SpRYc nuclease.
- To compare SpRYc performance in human cell lines and *Drosophila melanogaster*.
- To investigate the mechanistic basis for SpRYc's context-dependent activity.
Main Methods:
- Assessed SpRYc editing efficiency in HEK293, CEM-R5 T cells, and *Drosophila* S2 cells and embryos.
- Utilized CRISPR-Cas9 and SpRYc nucleases for genome editing experiments.
- Employed transcriptional activator dSpRYc-VPR and analyzed chromatin occupancy.
Main Results:
- SpRYc demonstrated broad PAM compatibility in HEK293 cells but with reduced efficiency at canonical sites compared to SpCas9.
- SpRYc activity was context-dependent, primarily targeting NGG PAMs in CEM-R5 T cells.
- SpRYc showed negligible activity in *Drosophila* embryos, while dSpRYc-VPR was active in S2 cells.
- Reduced chromatin occupancy of dSpRYc-VPR suggests a trade-off between PAM recognition and DNA-binding stability.
Conclusions:
- Expanded PAM targeting flexibility with SpRYc comes at the cost of variable editing efficiency.
- SpRYc's performance is highly dependent on the specific locus and cellular context.
- Extensive validation is required for PAM-relaxed genome editing tools before application.
Related Concept Videos
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- ChIP
Types of ChIP
ChIP can be divided into two types - X-ChIP and N-ChIP. X-ChIP involves in vivo cross-linking of histones and regulatory proteins to DNA, fragmenting the DNA by sonication, and isolating the protein-DNA...

