Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

12:18
Magnetic Resonance Elastography Methodology for the Evaluation of Tissue Engineered Construct Growth
Published on: February 9, 2012
12.8K
Testing the Reliability of a Procedure Using Shear-Wave Elastography for Measuring Longus Colli Muscle Stiffness
Juan Izquierdo-García1,2,3, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero3,4, Marcos José Navarro-Santana3,4
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 10, 2026
Summary
Shear-wave elastography (SWE) provides reliable measurements of longus colli (LC) muscle stiffness in patients with mechanical neck pain. A standardized protocol ensures reproducibility, with averaging acquisitions improving accuracy in multi-examiner scenarios.
Area of Science:
- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound
- Biomechanics
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Reproducible assessment of deep cervical muscle mechanics is crucial for clinical applications.
- The reliability of shear-wave elastography (SWE) for the longus colli (LC) muscle has not been previously established.
- Mechanical neck pain necessitates reliable methods for evaluating muscle function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the intra- and inter-examiner reliability of LC stiffness measurements using SWE.
- To establish the reproducibility of SWE for assessing LC muscle mechanical properties.
- To validate a standardized SWE protocol for patients with mechanical neck pain.
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal reliability study involving adults with chronic neck pain (≥6 months).
- Two examiners with varying experience performed bilateral LC imaging using standardized SWE presets.
- Measurements of shear-wave speed and Young's modulus were obtained, with reliability assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Main Results:
- Good to excellent inter-examiner agreement was observed for single (ICC3,2 > 0.818) and averaged (ICC3,2 > 0.866) LC stiffness measurements.
- Intra-examiner repeatability was good to excellent (ICC3,1 > 0.891) for a novice examiner and excellent (ICC3,1 > 0.973) for an experienced examiner.
- No significant differences in stiffness were found based on sex or side of measurement (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- A standardized SWE workflow enables reproducible measurement of LC stiffness in individuals with mechanical neck pain.
- For longitudinal studies, maintaining a single operator is recommended.
- In multi-examiner settings, averaging at least two acquisitions per side enhances the sensitivity to detect true changes in LC stiffness.

