Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026
Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
Published on: February 21, 2025
Impact of Anatomical Placement on the Accuracy of Wearable Heart Rate Monitors During Rest and Various Exercise
Masoud Moghaddam1, James P Collins1, Caroline E Gardner1
1Department of Physical Therapy, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Hazel Hall, Suite 2082, Princess Anne, MD 21853, USA.
Purpose:
This study evaluated the accuracy of arm-based photoplethysmography (PPG) wearable heart rate (HR) monitors in comparison to a validated chest strap reference across various activity levels.
Methods:
Twenty-eight healthy adults (14 males, 14 females; aged 23.8 ± 1.1 years) wore six HR monitors: Polar H10 chest strap, Polar Verity Sense on the forearm, Garmin Forerunner on the wrist, and three identical Whoop 4.0 devices placed on the left wrist, forearm, and upper arm. Participants completed rest, warm-up, high-intensity burpees, and graded treadmill exercise. HR data were analyzed using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), Bland-Altman analysis, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Deming regression.
Results:
Accuracy was highest at rest and gradually decreased as movement intensity increased. During rest, all devices showed minimal bias and high agreement (CCC > 0.99), with Verity Sense recording the lowest MAPE. In warm-up, Whoop-upper arm and Verity Sense outperformed wrist and Garmin positions, while the Whoop-forearm showed proportional and systematic bias. Burpees resulted in the lowest accuracy across devices (CCC < 0.50), but Whoop-upper arm performed better than other placements. During the Modified Bruce protocol, Verity Sense and Whoop-upper arm had the strongest agreement with the chest strap. Placement of identical Whoop units affected accuracy, with the upper arm outperforming forearm and wrist positions.
Conclusions:
PPG wearables provided accurate HR monitoring at rest, during warm-up, and during steady-state graded exercise, particularly when positioned proximally (forearm or upper arm). Accuracy declined during short, high-intensity, full-body activities due to motion artifacts. Both the forearm-mounted Verity Sense and the upper-arm Whoop demonstrated the closest agreement with the chest-strap reference. The intra-device comparison of identical Whoop units confirmed that anatomical placement alone significantly affects accuracy.
More Related Videos
05:48Autonomic Function Following Concussion in Youth Athletes: An Exploration of Heart Rate Variability Using 24-hour Recording Methodology
Published on: September 21, 2018
09:33Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Wearable Devices to Identify Central Versus Peripheral Limitations During Exercise
Published on: December 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
01:23Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
01:25Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
01:30Factors Influencing Heart Rate
Let us explore the significant factors affecting heart rate, including age, body temperature, posture, acute pain, chemical influences,...
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
01:30Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
01:20Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...