Mammograms in the media: a quality assessment of breast cancer screening videos on TikTok
- Imran Bitar 1, Bashar Jawich 2, Alexander Restum 2, Sidra Hasaba 3, Sayf Al-Katib 4, Kiran Nandalur 4
- Imran Bitar 1, Bashar Jawich 2, Alexander Restum 2
- 1Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, United States of America.
- 2Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States of America.
- 3Wayne State University, Department of Psychology, Detroit, MI, United States of America.
- 4Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Molecular Imaging, Royal Oak, MI, United States of America.
- 0Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, United States of America.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Physician and clinic-created breast cancer screening videos on TikTok offer higher quality information than non-physician content. This highlights the need for reliable social media health education to improve public understanding of screening.
Area Of Science
- Medical Informatics
- Public Health Communication
- Digital Health
Background
- Social media platforms like TikTok are increasingly used for health information dissemination.
- The quality and reliability of health content on these platforms, particularly for critical areas like cancer screening, require thorough evaluation.
Purpose Of The Study
- To assess the quality and reliability of breast cancer screening information shared on TikTok.
- To compare the quality scores of videos produced by physicians, non-physicians, and private clinics using the DISCERN tool.
Main Methods
- A systematic search for #BreastCancerScreening videos on TikTok was performed.
- 75 relevant videos were independently assessed by two reviewers using the DISCERN questionnaire.
- Content creators were categorized, and statistical analyses, including Kruskal-Wallis tests, were conducted.
Main Results
- Videos from physicians (mean DISCERN score 3.12) and private clinics (3.07) demonstrated higher quality than those from non-physicians (2.29).
- Content focused on breast cancer imaging scored highest (3.14), while personal experience videos scored lowest (2.35).
- Significant differences in DISCERN scores were observed across creator types (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
- The quality of breast cancer screening information on TikTok is variable, with physician and clinic-generated content being more reliable.
- The DISCERN tool measures clarity and comprehensiveness, not medical accuracy.
- Enhancing the clarity and reliability of social media health content is crucial for public health literacy and informed screening decisions.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

