Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Use of minimum and maximum pretest probabilities to conclude with confidence after obtaining a diagnostic test result
Loic Desquilbet1, Maxime Kurtz2, Morgane Canonne-Guibert3
1Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, Ecole nationale vétérinaire d'Alfort, Univ Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Maisons-Alfort, France.
None:
Interpreting positive and negative predictive values of diagnostic tests is crucial for clinical decision-making as they quantify the clinician's confidence in an individual's disease status after testing. For a given diagnostic test, these values depend on the pretest probability (ie, the probability that an individual has the disease before testing), which differs across individuals. Therefore, they should not be presented as a single pair for clinical use. To account for this individual variability in pretest probability and the minimum confidence level required to conclude on an individual's disease status, we propose the use of the minimum and maximum pretest probabilities ("PTP+conf" and "PTP-conf"). These thresholds depend on the test's sensitivity and specificity, as well as the clinician's predefined confidence level. They represent the pretest probability above (or below) which a positive (or negative) test result allows the clinician to reach that minimum confidence level ("conf") regarding the presence or absence of disease. These "PTP+conf" and "PTP-conf" values can be considered as intrinsic characteristics of a diagnostic test for a given confidence threshold. Clinicians then only need to compare their bedside estimate of the individual's pretest probability with "PTP+conf" (if positive result) or "PTP-conf" (if negative result) to determine whether they can conclude with sufficient confidence after obtaining the test result.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
P-value
P-value stands for the probability value. P-value is the probability that, if the null hypothesis is true, the results from another randomly selected sample will be as extreme or more extreme as the results obtained from the given sample.
A large P-value calculated from the data indicates to not reject the null hypothesis. But a higher P-value does not mean that the null hypothesis is true. The smaller the P-value, the more...

