Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Neutrophil Isolation Protocol
Published on: July 23, 2008
Consensus guidelines for ambulatory care for neutropenic fever
Joanne S K Teh1,2,3, Nikhil Singh1,2,4,5, Belinda Lambros1,2,5
1National Centre for Infection in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Insights
Updated guidelines recommend risk stratification for low-risk neutropenic fever, enabling safe ambulatory care. This approach offers clinical, economic, and psychosocial benefits for adult and pediatric patients, improving quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- Neutropenic fever management guidelines require updates based on new evidence.
- Ambulatory care for low-risk neutropenic fever offers significant benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide updated recommendations for ambulatory care of low-risk neutropenic fever in adults and children.
- To incorporate validated clinical decision rules for risk stratification.
Main Methods:
- Review of national and international data on neutropenic fever management.
- Validation of adult (MASCC, CISNE) and pediatric (AUS rule) clinical decision rules.
- Development of a structured care pathway incorporating safety net criteria.
Main Results:
- Risk stratification tools improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.
- Recommended adult rules: MASCC score, CISNE score. Recommended pediatric rule: AUS rule.
- Outlines infrastructure, oral antimicrobial regimens, and re-admission criteria for ambulatory care.
Conclusions:
- Updated guidelines support risk-stratified ambulatory care for low-risk neutropenic fever.
- Current biomarkers and wearable technologies are not recommended for routine use.
- Future research should address identified literature gaps.
Abstract:
These guidelines provide updated recommendations on ambulatory care for low-risk neutropenic fever in adult and paediatric patients. National and international data support the clinical, economic and psychosocial benefits of risk stratification, and home-based or reduced intensity treatment of neutropenic fever. Benefits include shortened in-hospital length of stay, reduced healthcare costs, early intravenous to oral switch and improved patient and caregiver quality of life. Since publication of the 2011 Australian consensus guidelines, additional adult and paediatric neutropenic fever clinical decision rules have been derived and validated. These rules assist clinicians in stratifying patients into lower or higher risk of serious infection. For adult patients the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia scores are recommended, whereas for paediatric patients the AUS rule has been prospectively derived and validated in the Australian setting. These rules are recommended as part of a structured low-risk neutropenic fever care pathway that incorporates additional disease-level, treatment-level and patient-level safety net criteria. Key infrastructure requirements for cost-effective and safe hospital-based ambulatory neutropenic fever care are discussed, as are recommended oral antimicrobial regimens and criteria for re-admission. Biomarkers and the use of new and wearable technologies are currently not routinely recommended as part of risk stratification or monitoring. Gaps in the literature are summarised and are anticipated to be the focus of future updates to these guidelines.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Urinary Tract Infection IV: Nursing Management
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Acute Kidney Injury VI: Nursing Management
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:

