Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

471
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
471
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

250
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
250
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

584
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
584
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.8K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

EXPRESS: The Effect of Response-code on Stroop Interference and Facilitation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Is "sky" bluer than "grass" is green? Word-color associations dataset for cognitive science.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Paper to Pixels: Enhancing Unilateral Neglect Assessment Using the New Computer Vision-Based Tool CANDO.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Item-specific control of word reading as evidenced by a novel proportion wordness effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

The Positive Effect of Negative Stimuli: Exposure to Negative Emotional Stimuli Improves Mood in Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Fragmented memories in the fog of war: Impaired associative memory under ongoing traumatic stress.

Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.6K

Irrelevant Task Difficulty Modulates the Emergence of Task Conflict.

Ronen Hershman1, Eldad Keha2,3, Lisa Beckmann4

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Journal of Cognition
|January 12, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Cognitive control involves managing task-relevant information while ignoring irrelevant stimuli. This study shows that task conflict increases with the difficulty of ignoring irrelevant information, suggesting limited inhibitory control.

Keywords:
AutomaticityStroop effectcognitive controlnumerical cognitiontask conflict

More Related Videos

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.8K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.6K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.8K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Information Processing

Background:

  • Cognitive control tasks require participants to focus on relevant stimuli and ignore irrelevant ones.
  • Task conflict, often studied using tasks like the Stroop task, arises from processing multiple stimulus dimensions.
  • Previous research inferred task conflict by comparing dual-task conditions with single-task conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the difficulty of the irrelevant stimulus dimension affects task conflict.
  • To determine if task conflict operates on a continuum.
  • To explore the limits of inhibitory control over involuntary processes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a color-digit Stroop task with varying difficulty levels for the irrelevant dimension.
  • Included a control experiment to specifically assess the difficulty of the irrelevant dimension.
  • Compared performance across congruent, incongruent, and neutral trials to infer conflict.

Main Results:

  • Information conflict was present across all experiments.
  • Task conflict increased as the difficulty of perceiving the irrelevant dimension increased.
  • The degree of task conflict scaled with the processing demands of the irrelevant task.

Conclusions:

  • Task conflict is not an all-or-none phenomenon but exists on a continuum.
  • The findings suggest that inhibitory control is limited, as irrelevant processes remain active even when demanding resources.
  • This highlights the continuous engagement of involuntary processes despite cognitive control efforts.