Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Somatosensation01:33

Somatosensation

43.0K
The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.
43.0K
Tactile and Chemical Senses01:27

Tactile and Chemical Senses

699
Tactile senses encompass touch, temperature, and pain, each mediated by specific receptors. Touch receptors detect mechanical energy or pressure against the skin. Sensory fibers from these receptors enter the spinal cord and relay information to the brain stem. Here, most fibers cross over to the opposite side of the brain. The touch information then moves to the thalamus, which projects a map of the body's surface onto the somatosensory areas of the parietal lobes in the cerebral cortex.
699
Responses to Gravity and Touch02:26

Responses to Gravity and Touch

41.6K
Gravitropism: Plant Responses to Gravity
41.6K
Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers01:24

Local Anesthetics: Differential Sensitivity of Nerve Fibers

1.3K
Local anesthetics (LAs) block the sodium channels of nerve trunks, sensory nerve endings, and neuromuscular junctions. Although LAs can block all kinds of nerves, the sensitivity of nerve fibers differs according to nerve types and structures. LAs are known to block myelinated fibers faster than unmyelinated ones. Also, they block pain or sensory neurons at low concentrations without affecting the motor neurons involved in muscle contractions. This helps relieve labor pain without affecting the...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stimulation success!? Improved response inhibition performance after prefrontal single-site and condition-and-perturb transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same author

Spoiler alert: Reliable distractor response cues benefit response selection.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Re-visiting an affective modulation of stimulus-response binding and retrieval.

Cognition & emotion·2026
Same author

No error on the side of safety: No representational momentum for auditory looming stimuli.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Not proportional after all: Investigating speed perception with the beep-speed illusion.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

When affordances are not universal: The negative compatibility effect is modulated by task type and spatial association.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.8K

The Touching Difference: Evidence for Stimulus-Response Binding Effects in Tactile Detection and Localization

Lars-Michael Schöpper1, Paula Soballa1, Simon Merz1

  • 1Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, DE.

Journal of Cognition
|January 12, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Action control theories explain how stimulus-response (S-R) binding affects performance. This study found tactile S-R binding in detection and localization, but not visual S-R binding, suggesting modality dependence.

Keywords:
Action controlAttentional orientingStimulus-response bindingmodality dependence

More Related Videos

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.8K
Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

13.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.8K
Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

5.8K
Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects
07:32

Measurement of Vibration Detection Threshold and Tactile Spatial Acuity in Human Subjects

Published on: September 1, 2016

13.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Action control theories propose stimulus-response (S-R) binding into 'event files'.
  • Repetition of event file components influences performance, with benefits for full repetition and costs for partial repetition.
  • S-R binding effects are common but typically absent in visual detection and localization tasks, unlike auditory tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate modality dependence of S-R binding effects.
  • To compare S-R binding in visual versus tactile detection and localization tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Participants performed visual and tactile target detection tasks.
  • Experiment 2: Participants performed visual and tactile target localization tasks.
  • Tactile targets varied in intensity and rhythm; visual targets varied in color.

Main Results:

  • Evidence of S-R binding and retrieval was observed in the tactile domain for both detection and localization.
  • S-R binding effects were completely absent in the visual domain for both tasks.
  • Results indicate a modality-dependent effect for S-R binding.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the hypothesis of modality dependence in S-R binding.
  • Tactile stimuli appear to facilitate S-R binding, whereas visual stimuli do not in detection and localization.
  • This research extends understanding of action control and sensory processing across different modalities.