Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Multi-Modal Home Sleep Monitoring in Older Adults
Published on: January 26, 2019
Assessing the performance of a portable electroencephalographic sleep monitor against level 1 polysomnography
Malika Lanthier1,2, Michael-Christopher Foti3, Karina Fonseca1,2
1Sleep Research Unit, University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research at the Royal, Ottawa, ON K1Z 7K4, Canada.
Study Objectives:
To assess the performance of a portable electroencephalography device for sleep monitoring against polysomnography.
Method:
Fifty-six adults underwent one night of in-laboratory sleep recording with the Muse-S headband and simultaneous level 1 polysomnography. Muse-S data were scored by an automated sleep staging algorithm. A registered technologist, blind to the Muse-S automated sleep scoring, scored the polysomnography data.
Results:
Good quality data were available for 47 (84 per cent) participants (53 per cent females; 20-71 years old; 17 per cent with sleep-related breathing disorder). Epoch-by-epoch analyses showed substantial agreement between the Muse-S and polysomnography (full night Cohen's Kappa = 0.76). Cohen's Kappa were in the fair agreement range for non-rapid eye movement (NREM) 1, substantial agreement range for NREM2 and NREM3, and near-perfect agreement range for rapid eye movement sleep and wake. Accuracy ranged from 88 per cent to 96 per cent across all sleep stages, with a sensitivity of 79-92 per cent and a specificity of 90-99 per cent. Similar results were observed in the subgroup with sleep-related breathing disorder. On average, the Muse-S had higher mean values than polysomnography for total sleep time (+6 min), NREM3 (+15 min), rapid eye movement sleep (+6 min), and sleep efficiency (+1.5 per cent), and lower mean values for sleep latency (-3 min), wake after sleep onset (-3 min), and light sleep (-14 min).
Conclusions:
When compared to standard polysomnography, the Muse-S performed well to measure sleep macroarchitecture. This portable device shows great potential as an accessible tool for sleep electroencephalography monitoring. More work is required to validate this tool in more diverse populations to ensure robustness across age, sex, neurological conditions, and sleep profiles.This article is part of the Consumer Sleep Technology Special Collection.
More Related Videos
04:33Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Connection Between Sleep Disorders and Cognitive Symptoms in Depression
Published on: April 26, 2024
05:51Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
Published on: February 21, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...