Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

14.4K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
14.4K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.0K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.0K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

1.9K
1.9K
Protein-Drug Binding: Mechanism and Kinetics01:16

Protein-Drug Binding: Mechanism and Kinetics

1.6K
Protein-drug binding refers to the interaction between drugs and proteins within the body. This binding process can occur intracellularly, involving drug interactions with enzymes or receptors within cells, or extracellularly, involving plasma proteins in the blood.
Various forces drive these interactions, including hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, ionic bonds, electrostatic interactions, and van der Waals forces. These bonds enable drugs to bind to specific sites on proteins,...
1.6K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

14.8K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
14.8K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

9.9K
9.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HBcompare: Classifying Ligand Binding Preferences with Hydrogen Bond Topology.

Biomolecules·2022
Same author

Analysis of Protein-Protein Interactions for Intermolecular Bond Prediction.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same author

Precise parallel volumetric comparison of molecular surfaces and electrostatic isopotentials.

Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K

Automatic Explanation of Protein-Protein Binding Mechanism: A Preliminary Study.

Justin Z Tam1, Yangying Liu1, Dhruv S Jain2

  • 1Lehigh University, Dept. Computer Science & Engineering, Bethlehem, PA USA.

Computational Structural Bioinformatics : International Workshop, CSBW 2024, Boston, MA, USA, November 16, 2024, Proceeding. Computational Structural Bioinformatics Workshop (2024 : Boston, Mass.)
|January 12, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new machine learning approach to interpret protein-protein interaction mechanisms. Findings reveal hydrophobicity

Keywords:
Protein Structure/FunctionProtein-protein Interactions

More Related Videos

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K
Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are crucial for cellular functions.
  • Understanding PPI mechanisms traditionally relies on laborious mutation studies and structural analysis.
  • Developing computational methods to elucidate PPI mechanisms is highly desirable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel machine learning-based approach for interpreting mechanistic insights of PPIs.
  • To evaluate the utility of SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) features for understanding PPI mechanisms.
  • To challenge conventional assumptions regarding the roles of different interaction types in PPIs.

Main Methods:

  • Manual annotation of 1225 mutation experiments with mechanistic insights (electrostatic, hydrogen bonding, steric, hydrophobic).
  • Training a Gradient-Boosting Tree (GBT) model to predict protein binding affinity.
  • Extraction and analysis of SHAP features from the GBT model to represent PPI mechanisms.

Main Results:

  • SHAP values showed good agreement with annotated mechanisms, particularly for electrostatic and steric interactions.
  • Hydrophobic interactions were consistently identified as the dominant factor.
  • Hydrogen bonds were found to play a consistently secondary role, contrary to some traditional views.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning, specifically SHAP analysis, can effectively interpret biochemical mechanisms of PPIs.
  • The study highlights the dominant role of hydrophobicity and a secondary role for hydrogen bonds in PPIs.
  • This approach offers a powerful tool for advancing the study of protein-protein interactions.