Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Development of a 68Gallium-Labeled D-Peptide PET Tracer for Imaging Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression
Published on: February 3, 2023
Concordance of programmed death-ligand 1 expression assessments determined via two immunohistochemical tests and the
Marina A Senchukova1, Natalia V Saidler2, Evgeniya Yu Zubareva3
1Scientific and Clinical Center No. 3, Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery, Moscow 108840, Troitsk, Russia. masenchukova@yandex.com.
Background:
We previously demonstrated that the antibody against programmed cell death protein 1 ligand 1 (PDCD1 LG1) is a promising new marker of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression that correlates with both breast cancer (BC) clinicopathological characteristics and tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy. However, the concordance of PDCD1 LG1 expression scoring with immunohistochemical (IHC) tests approved for clinical use and with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method has not been previously studied.
Aim:
To evaluate the concordance of methods for assessing PD-L1 expression, IHC tests with anti-PD-L1 (PDCD1 LG1) and anti-PD-L1 (SP142) antibodies and PCR.
Methods:
This prospective single-center observational cohort study included 148 patients with BC. PD-L1 expression in immune cells was assessed by the IHC method with anti-PD-L1 (PDCD1 LG1) and anti-PD-L1 (SP142) antibodies and by PCR. The concordance of PD-L1 scores between tests was assessed with positive percentage agreement (PPA) and negative percentage agreement (NPA). The strength of the agreement between the methods was calculated via the Cohen kappa index. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
Regardless of the method used to assess marker expression, PD-L1 expression was significantly more often detected in patients with negative estrogen receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive (HER2+) status, luminal B HER+ BC, nonluminal HER+ BC and triple-negative BC. PPA and NPA were 38.3% and 70.4%, respectively, for PD-L1 (PDCD1 LG1) and PD-L1 (SP142); 26.3% and 63.3%, respectively, for PD-L1 (PDCD1 LG1) and PD-L1 (PCR); and 36.5% and 74.4%, respectively, for PD-L1 (SP142) and PD-L1 (PCR). Cohen's kappa index for PD-L1 (PDCD1 LG1) and PD-L1 (SP142) was 0.385 (95%CI: 0.304-0.466), that for PD-L1 (PDCD1 LG1) and PD-L1 (PCR) was 0.207 (95%CI: 0.127-0.287), and that for PD-L1 (SP142) and PD-L1 (PCR) was 0.389 (95%CI: 0.309-0.469).
Conclusion:
Thus, all three markers of PD-L1 expression are associated with the characteristics of aggressive BC, demonstrating moderate concordance between the tests.
More Related Videos
07:43Using 22C3 Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Concentrate on Biopsy and Cytology Samples from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Published on: September 25, 2018
10:29Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019