Myelin g Ratios: The Model Is in the Details
Alexander Gow1,2,3
1Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
ASN Neuro
|January 12, 2026
Summary
This study evaluates methods for measuring myelin g-ratio using electron microscopy. A widely used method is flawed, potentially leading to inaccurate conclusions about white matter integrity and neuropathology.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biophysics
Background:
- Current myelin biology research prioritizes speed over analytical rigor.
- This trend neglects mechanistic understanding in preclinical and clinical studies.
- Electron microscopy (EM) is the gold standard for assessing white matter integrity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically assess three mathematical models for estimating myelin g-ratio from EM data.
- To identify inconsistencies in commonly used g-ratio measurement techniques.
- To evaluate the potential of non-invasive neuroimaging for clinical myelin assessment.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of three distinct mathematical models for g-ratio estimation.
- Comparison of model outputs with the axon versus fiber diameter relationship derived from EM data.
- Assessment of model consistency and biological plausibility.
Main Results:
- Two models align with the linear axon-fiber diameter relationship.
- The canonical g-ratio model exhibits internal inconsistencies and deviates from the principal data.
- This inconsistency can lead to erroneous conclusions regarding myelin integrity.
Conclusions:
- The canonical g-ratio model requires re-evaluation due to its discordance with fundamental data.
- Accurate EM-derived g-ratios are crucial for calibrating non-invasive imaging techniques like MRI.
- MRI shows promise for clinical myelin assessment, particularly in organized white matter tracts.


