Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
Hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery improves glycaemic control compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy: A
Amardeep S Sidki1,2, Patrick J Highton1,3, Lauren L O'Mahoney1,3
1Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Aim:
Although hybrid closed-loop systems (HCLS) and sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy are advanced diabetes management technologies for type 1 diabetes, their relative efficacy in optimising glycaemic control is not fully established. This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of HCLS versus SAP therapy on glucose regulation across multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and randomised crossover trials (RCOs). The primary aim was to determine the efficacy of HCLS in improving glycaemic control, reducing glucose variability and enhancing time in range (TIR) compared with SAP therapy.
Methods:
The review was prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews as CRD42023488722. Data from 27 studies involving over 1000 participants were analysed. The studies included both RCTs and RCOs that compared HCLS with SAP therapy. Key metrics assessed were mean glucose levels, glucose variability (coefficient of variation and standard deviation), low blood glucose index (LBGI), high blood glucose index (HBGI), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and TIR (3.9-10.0 mmol/L). Hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia outcomes were also evaluated.
Results:
HCLS significantly reduced mean glucose levels by 2.0 mg/dL compared with SAP therapy. It also decreased glucose variability, including CV and SD, and reduced LBGI, HBGI and HbA1c. HCLS increased TIR by 8.8%. Regarding hyperglycaemia, HCLS reduced the time spent above 10 mmol/L by 7.8%, above 13.9 mmol/L by 3.63% and above 16.7 mmol/L by 0.88%. Hypoglycaemia outcomes showed modest improvements, with reductions in time below 3 mmol/L by 0.10% and below 3.9 mmol/L by 0.72%.
Conclusions:
Our findings support HCLS as a superior modality to SAP therapy in improving glycaemic control, particularly in paediatric populations. HCLS effectively reduces hyperglycaemia and increases TIR, with modest effects on hypoglycaemia. The clinical implications are significant, highlighting the advantages of HCLS in optimising glucose regulation and mitigating glycaemic variability. This technology offers improved glycaemic control and enhanced quality of life for people living with type 1 diabetes.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into...
Diabetes Mellitus: Overview and Type I Subtype
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system mistakenly attacks and destroys the insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. As a result, the body is unable to produce sufficient insulin, and individuals with...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Carbohydrate Metabolism
Starch accounts for approximately 60% of the carbohydrates consumed by humans. Since amylase enzymes cannot function in the stomach's acidic environment, starch can only be digested in the mouth and small intestine. Simple sugars are found naturally in milk and fruits in...

