Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

925
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
925
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.8K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Chebyshev polynomial series frequency modulation model for waveform design and analysis.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

The Editors' and Readers' Choice Awards 2026: sustained recognition of outstanding articles in the Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2026
Same author

Auditory brainstem response parameters in big brown bats are insensitive to echo glint structure.

JASA express letters·2025
Same author

From mechanoecology to sensory physiology to olfactory navigation: the Editors' and Readers' Choice Awards 2025.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2025
Same author

Microseconds-level coding of echo delay in the auditory brainstem of an FM-echolocating bat.

Journal of neurophysiology·2024
Same author

Echolocating Bats Have Evolved Decreased Susceptibility to Noise-Induced Temporary Hearing Losses.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2024
Same journal

Differential responses to photoperiod in juveniles of two migratory songbird species.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same journal

A Drosophila overgrowth model reveals extracellular matrix crosslinking limits cardiovascular scaling.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same journal

Control of High-speed Jumps: Removing rotation from the jumps of locusts (Schistocerca gregaria).

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same journal

Limits and mechanisms of honey bee colonial thermoregulation in the heat.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same journal

Correction: Sprinting performance is linked to surface activity in scorpions.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same journal

Tactile pup loss and acoustic signal enhance selective maternal retrieval behavior in echolocating bats, Pipistrellus abramus.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.2K

Biosonar dynamics and spatial attention in an unpredictable virtual localization task.

Amaro Tuninetti1, Pedro R Polanco2, James A Simmons2,3

  • 1Department of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

The Journal of Experimental Biology
|January 13, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Big brown bats adjust spatial attention when localizing echoes. Peripheral target shifts and clutter decrease accuracy, showing attention is biased centrally.

Keywords:
Adaptive sensingBatEcholocationHorizontal sound localizationSonar beam

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 14, 2026

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

15.2K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.3K
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function
06:17

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Effects of Mind-Body-Movement Practices on Brain Function

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior
  • Sensory neuroscience
  • Bioacoustics

Background:

  • Echolocating bats navigate complex environments by emitting sound and interpreting returning echoes.
  • Understanding how bats process auditory spatial information is crucial for comprehending their foraging strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how big brown bats adjust spatial attention during echo localization.
  • To determine the influence of unpredictable target shifts and background clutter on bat echolocation accuracy and behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Psychophysical experiments using virtual auditory targets presented via loudspeakers.
  • Trained four big brown bats to detect and localize echoes in stationary and shifting conditions.
  • Manipulated target unpredictability, peripheral shifts, and weak background clutter.

Main Results:

  • Bats were less accurate with peripheral and contralateral target shifts.
  • Localization was faster but less precise in the periphery, with a tendency for central acoustic gaze.
  • Weak clutter reduced localization accuracy and slowed beam aim adjustment.
  • Bats increased echolocation effort (reduced interpulse intervals, more sound groups) when localizing shifted targets, indicating higher perceived difficulty.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial attention in echolocating bats is biased towards the center of their acoustic field of view.
  • Background clutter significantly impacts echo localization performance and attentional strategies.
  • Individual bats exhibit different problem-solving approaches, highlighting behavioral plasticity.