Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 14, 2026
Pilot In Vitro Study to Assess Cleaning Ability and Effects of Different Decontamination Methods on Implant Surfaces
Published on: November 21, 2025
Residuals of Chemical Cleaning Agents Impair Peri-Implant Cell Viability: An in Vitro Study
Qiang Wang1, Håvard Jostein Haugen1, Dirk Linke2
1Department of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo 0455, Norway.
Background:
Chemical debridement agents are commonly used during the cleaning of implants for peri-implantitis treatment; however, how these agents affect lesion healing remains unclear. In addition, the dose- and time-dependent effects of these residuals on implant biocompatibility remain poorly understood.
Materials And Methods:
We evaluated the effects of active compounds in commercial products-3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), 0.43% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), and 0.12% chlorhexidine with 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride (CHX-CPC) at graded dilutions on murine osteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1), human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs), and human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (hBMSCs). Cells were cultured for 24 h, then exposed to the agents for 2, 12, or 24 h. Cytotoxicity and viability were assessed using lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and CCK-8 assays, while cell morphology was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Apoptotic gene expression (BCL2, MCL1, BAX) was analyzed after 2 h using quantitative PCR.
Results:
At high concentrations, H2O2 and NaClO significantly reduced LDH activity in supernatant, likely due to oxidant-induced enzyme inactivation. All three agents inhibited cell viability in a dose- and time-dependent manner, accompanied by cell shrinkage and deformation. Among the tested cell types, hBMSCs displayed greater resistance to H2O2, maintaining proliferative viability at 0.15% (1:20 dilution). Gene expression analysis revealed that concentrated H2O2 and CHX-CPC downregulated BCL2 and MCL1 expression in MC3T3-E1 cells, with broader suppression of these genes observed in HGFs across all agents. In hBMSCs, high concentrations of the agents did not significantly reduce BCL2 and MCL1 levels.
Conclusion:
Residual chemical debridement agents, when inadequately removed, compromise the viability of cells in peri-implant tissues in a dose- and time-dependent manner. hBMSCs exhibited greater resistance to apoptosis than MC3T3-E1 cells and HGFs. Thorough removal of residual chemical cleaning agents after peri-implant debridement is therefore crucial to preserve the biocompatibility of the implant and the healing potential of peri-implant tissues.
