Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

07:01
Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
5.2K
AtomThink: Multimodal Slow Thinking With Atomic Step Reasoning
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
|January 13, 2026
Summary
This study introduces AtomThink, a novel framework for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that adapts reasoning complexity. AtomThink enhances performance on complex tasks while preventing overthinking on simpler ones.
Area of Science:
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computer Vision
- Natural Language Processing
Background:
- Multimodal reasoning in large language models (LLMs) is a complex challenge.
- Existing methods often use rigid templates or unstructured approaches, leading to inefficiencies.
- Adaptive reasoning strategies are needed to handle varying question complexities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a novel framework, AtomThink, for adaptive multimodal reasoning in LLMs.
- To introduce a Self-structured Chain of Thought (SCoT) paradigm for flexible reasoning.
- To improve both accuracy and efficiency in multimodal tasks.
Main Methods:
- Proposed the Self-structured Chain of Thought (SCoT) paradigm with minimal semantic atomic steps.
- Designed the AtomThink framework with a data engine, supervised fine-tuning, policy-guided inference, and an atomic capability metric.
- Utilized serialized inference data for supervised fine-tuning.
Main Results:
- Achieved over 10% average accuracy gains on MathVista and MathVerse datasets.
- Demonstrated significant improvements compared to state-of-the-art structured Chain of Thought (CoT) approaches.
- Improved data utilization by 5x and inference efficiency by 85.3%.
Conclusions:
- AtomThink enables adaptive reasoning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs).
- The SCoT paradigm offers flexible and efficient reasoning structures.
- AtomThink significantly advances the performance and efficiency of multimodal AI systems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reasoning
395
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
395
Inductive Reasoning
64.8K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
64.8K
Deductive Reasoning
64.1K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
64.1K
Reason and Intuition
7.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.4K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
5.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.1K
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving
687
Statically indeterminate problems are those where statics alone can not determine the internal forces or reactions. Consider a structure comprising two cylindrical rods made of steel and brass. These rods are joined at point B and restrained by rigid supports at points A and C. Now, the reactions at points A and C and the deflection at point B are to be determined. This rod structure is classified as statically indeterminate as the structure has more supports than are necessary for maintaining...
687

