Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026

Author Spotlight: On-Site Biochar Production for Woody Debris Incineration in Forestry
Published on: January 5, 2024
[Analysis of Carbon Footprint and Emission Reduction Path of a Science and Technology Park]
Zi-Yi Li1, Jun-Jie Li1, Dong-Peng Zhou2
1School of the Environment, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.
Abstract:
Science and technology parks play a pivotal role in national technological innovation. In the context of China's goals for emission peaking and carbon neutrality, assessing their carbon footprints and pathways to emission peaking is essential for fostering economic development and facilitating the low-carbon transition. This study established a carbon footprint accounting framework for science and technology parks and applied it to a high-tech and advanced manufacturing park in Beijing as a case study. A refined modeling of key energy-related emission sources was conducted, followed by a dynamic carbon footprint analysis from 2011 to 2023 based on first-hand activity data. Future emission peaking pathways were projected using scenario analysis and Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index decomposition, with corresponding low-carbon development strategies proposed. The results indicate that:① The carbon footprint (measured in CO2-eq) increased from 67 748.93 tons in 2011 to 174 615.45 tons in 2023, with Scope 1 emissions peaking at 16 422.44 tons in 2020, approximately 90% of which came from stationary combustion sources. Scope 2 emissions declined to 37.52% of total emissions by 2023 after peaking at 69 475.74 tons in 2018, and Scope 3 emissions, the largest and fastest-growing component, accounted for 55.27% in 2023, primarily driven by workforce expansion and related factors. ② Scenario analysis suggested that the green low-carbon scenario offered the highest emission reduction potential, enabling the park to peak at 175 200.20 tons by 2026, while the baseline scenario projected a peak of 188 413.33 tons in 2028, and the industrial expansion scenario failed to peak by 2030, reaching 216 410.39 tons. The increase in the carbon footprint of the park across all three scenarios was primarily driven by the amount of purchased electricity, the number of employees, and carbon emissions associated with employee travel; thus, to mitigate these impacts, future science and technology parks should focus on strengthening energy efficiency management while enhancing digitalization and intelligent park operations as well as promoting green transportation, whereas the decarbonization of electricity consumption and the reduction in fuel-powered vehicles have already curbed carbon emissions to some extent, which can be further reinforced by increasing the share of clean energy and optimizing low-carbon transportation systems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Sustainability in Concrete Building
There are multiple approaches to achieve sustainability in a commercial concrete building. For instance, construct a concrete parking area under the building, utilizing pervious concrete paver blocks in open areas to facilitate rainwater collection through an underground...
The Carbon Cycle
Carbon-dioxide Fixation
Energy Conservation and Bernoulli's Equation
All the terms in the equation have the dimension of energy per unit volume. The kinetic energy per unit volume is called the kinetic energy density, and the potential energy per unit volume is...
Conservation of Energy: Application
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a...

