Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 15, 2026
Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
State-level variability in discharge to inpatient rehabilitation after severe traumatic injuries
Alexander J Ordoobadi1, Kimberly K Greenberg, Gracyn Campbell
1Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery (A.J.O., S.I., J.S.W., A.S., M.P.J.), Brigham and Women's Hospital; The Gillian Reny Stepping Strong Center for Trauma Innovation (A.J.O., A.S., M.P.J.), Brigham and Women's Hospital; Spaulding Rehabilitation, Mass General Brigham (K.K.G., J.C.S.); Harvard Medical School (G.C.); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (J.C.S.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (Z.G.H.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Emergency Medicine (C.N.), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (A.S.), Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Introduction:
Rehabilitation at inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) has been shown to improve seriously injured patients' long-term functional independence. However, not all patients with severe injuries are discharged to an IRF. The aim of this study is to examine differences in the proportion of severely injured patients discharged to IRFs across US states and assess the association between the regional supply of IRFs and the likelihood of IRF discharge.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective analysis of 2021 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases across 13 states. We included severely injured (ISS >15) adult patients who survived to hospital discharge. We calculated the marginal probability of discharge to IRF, skilled nursing facility, home health agency, or home without services across states using a multinomial logistic regression model to control for patient demographics, insurance type, injury severity, medical comorbidities, and trauma center level. We also performed a mixed-effects logistic regression to evaluate the association between the supply of IRFs within individual states with the likelihood of discharge to IRF.
Results:
We identified 104,017 severely injured patients. Across all 13 included states, 13% of patients were discharged to IRFs. There was considerable variation in the adjusted probability of discharge to an IRF across states, ranging from 6.4% in Oregon (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6-7.1%) to 22.1% in Kentucky (95% CI, 20.8-23.4%), after controlling for potential confounders. The state-level supply of IRFs ranged from 0.49 to 8.63 per 1,000,000 population in Maryland and Arkansas, respectively. Each additional IRF per 1,000,000 population was associated with 11% increased odds of discharge to IRF (95% CI, 1.01-1.21; p = 0.024).
Conclusion:
Severely injured patients face substantial differences in accessing high-level rehabilitation care at an IRF depending on their state of residence. Increasing the availability of IRFs within underserved states may improve access to specialized rehabilitation care for trauma patients. ( J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2026;100: 722-729. Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.).
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
01:31Discharge Summary Forms
Here's a detailed look at the key components and guidelines for preparing a discharge summary:
01:19Restorative Care
01:26Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History: