Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural and cardiorespiratory responses in vocalization and slow breathing: Contrasting brain and autonomic responses.

PloS one·2026
Same author

The rhythms of trance: Cultural phenomenology and neural mechanisms of music-induced non-ordinary states of consciousness.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

Intact sensorimotor rhythm abilities but altered audiovisual integration in cochlear implant users.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Preferences and Attitudes Toward Music in Nonclinical Uses of Psychedelics.

Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

A Multimodal Investigation of Listening Effort in Single-Sided Deafness.

American journal of audiology·2024
Same author

Pupillometry reveals effects of pitch manipulation within and across words on listening effort and short-term memory.

Scientific reports·2024
Same journal

Sudden Traumatic Noise Exposure Induces an altered wave I in the Auditory Brainstem Response in Human.

Audiology & neuro-otology·2026
Same journal

Test Equivalency of the Spanish and English AzBio Sentences Among Bilingual Normal Hearers.

Audiology & neuro-otology·2026
Same journal

Inner Ear Test Battery Aligned with Hydrops Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Differentiate Acute-Onset Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Audiology & neuro-otology·2026
Same journal

Audiometric Outcomes and Longitudinal Trends of Sequential Cochlear Implantation in Adults with Bilateral Deafness: A 20-Year Single-Center Study.

Audiology & neuro-otology·2026
Same journal

Pediatric Robotic Cochlear Implantation: Hearing Outcomes.

Audiology & neuro-otology·2026
Same journal

A Prospective Study on the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Smartphone Weber Test in Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Audiology & neuro-otology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

799

Using Machine Learning to Predict Cochlear Implant Outcomes.

Madeleine Anthonisen1, Diane Lazard2,3, Alexandre Lehmann4

  • 1Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada, antm5380@usherbrooke.ca.

Audiology & Neuro-Otology
|January 14, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models modestly improve cochlear implant outcome prediction, but over 80% of variance remains unexplained. Key predictors include duration of use, age, and hearing loss severity, suggesting new factors are needed.

Keywords:
Clinical predictorsCochlear implant outcomesEnsemble methodsMachine learning

More Related Videos

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

799
Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.9K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Cochlear implant outcomes show wide variability, with traditional methods explaining less than 20% of this variance.
  • Predicting individual patient success with cochlear implants remains a significant clinical challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models in predicting cochlear implant outcomes compared to traditional linear methods.
  • To identify key factors influencing the variability in cochlear implant performance.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study analyzed data from 2251 adult cochlear implant recipients across 15 centers.
  • Seven ML models, including Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), were compared against Linear Regression.
  • Models were optimized and validated using grid search, cross-validation, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for feature importance.

Main Results:

  • XGBoost demonstrated the best performance, reducing prediction error by 4.11% compared to linear regression (p=0.003).
  • All ensemble ML methods significantly outperformed linear regression in predicting speech recognition scores.
  • Important predictors identified were duration of cochlear implant use, age at implantation, duration of hearing loss, and preoperative scores.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning models offer a modest improvement in predicting cochlear implant outcomes.
  • Over 80% of outcome variance remains unexplained, indicating the need for novel predictive factors beyond routine clinical data.