Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins02:18

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

19.2K
Intrinsically disordered proteins are a group of proteins that do not fold into specific three-dimensional structures. Their structural flexibility allows them to complement ordered proteins to perform functions that are inaccessible to rigid structures. They are more common in eukaryotes than prokaryotes and may either be exclusively intrinsically disordered or hybrid proteins, consisting of a mix of ordered and disordered regions. The absence of a rigid structure in these proteins can be...
19.2K
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins02:18

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

2.8K
2.8K
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

14.4K
Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...
14.4K
Protein-Protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-Protein Interfaces

4.4K
4.4K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.0K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.0K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

1.9K
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Integrative Modeling with AlphaFold" [Curr Opin Struct Biol 98 (June 2026) 103239].

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same author

Multicomplex Integrative Structural Modeling of a Human Histone Deacetylase Interactome.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Integrative modeling with AlphaFold.

Current opinion in structural biology·2026
Same author

Learning the language of protein-protein interactions.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

IHMValidation: Assessment of Integrative Structure Models Deposited to the Protein Data Bank.

Journal of molecular biology·2025
Same author

PickET: An unsupervised method for localizing macromolecules in cryo-electron tomograms.

Research square·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

7.7K

Disobind: A sequence-based, partner-dependent contact map and interface residue predictor for intrinsically

Kartik Majila1, Varun Ullanat1, Shruthi Viswanath1

  • 1National Center for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, Karnataka, India.

Cell Systems
|January 14, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Disobind, a new deep-learning tool, accurately predicts intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) interactions using only sequences. It outperforms existing methods, aiding in understanding IDP functions in complex biological systems.

Keywords:
DLIDPIDRdeep learningintrinsically disordered proteinsintrinsically disordered regionspLMsprotein language modelprotein structure

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

949

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

7.7K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

949

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Protein Science
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) exhibit dynamic structures and diverse binding modes.
  • Characterizing the interfaces of IDPs remains a significant experimental and computational challenge.
  • Current prediction tools like AlphaFold struggle with IDP binding site accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel deep-learning method, Disobind, for predicting inter-protein contact maps and interface residues for IDPs.
  • To improve the accuracy and efficiency of IDP interface prediction compared to existing methods.

Main Methods:

  • Disobind utilizes sequence embeddings from the ProtT5 protein language model.
  • The method predicts protein-protein contact maps and interface residues directly from amino acid sequences.
  • Performance was evaluated against state-of-the-art interface predictors and AlphaFold models.

Main Results:

  • Disobind significantly outperforms existing interface predictors for IDPs.
  • Disobind demonstrates superior performance compared to AlphaFold multimer and AlphaFold3 across various confidence thresholds.
  • Combining Disobind with AlphaFold-multimer predictions further enhances prediction accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Disobind offers a robust and accurate approach for characterizing IDP-mediated interactions without requiring structural or multiple sequence alignment data.
  • The method's ability to consider binding partner context and rely solely on sequences makes it a valuable tool for IDP research.
  • Disobind predictions can aid in localizing IDPs within large molecular assemblies and elucidating their functional roles.