Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Generalism as a cross-disciplinary practice in medicine: Mixed-studies systematic review
Martina Ann Kelly1, Sarah Cheung2, Agalya Ramanathan3
1Professor of Family Medicine and Community Health Sciences in the Cumming School of Medicine at the University of Calgary in Alberta.
Objective:
To clarify who generalist physicians are and what characterizes their practice.
Data Sources:
MEDLINE, PsycInfo, SocINDEX, Embase, Ovid HealthSTAR, Scopus, and Web of Science.
Study Selection:
Empirical studies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods) that described the attributes of generalist physicians across various disciplines in the clinical literature.
Synthesis:
A total of 262 studies from 25 countries met inclusion criteria. Forty-seven percent of studies lacked essential participant information. The remaining studies primarily framed generalism in terms of an absence of specialist training, reflecting a "deficit model" of care. We identified 4 archetypes of generalist practice: broad-based knowledge, generalism as adaptive expertise, generalism as integrative expertise, and generalism as interpretive expertise.
Conclusion:
Generalism lacks a consistent meaning across clinical disciplines in medicine. Four archetypes of practice are proposed to promote cross-disciplinary dialogue and guide the design of future health care systems and professional roles.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-reactivity
Genomics
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
