Pathologic Assessment of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Position Paper By the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal...

Most primary retroperitoneal soft tissue tumors are malignant, with liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas being the most common. However, other sarcomas and benign tumors can also occur in this location. Pathologic evaluation of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) presents unique challenges. Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group with overlapping microscopic features, making accurate classification essential for prognosis and evolving targeted therapies. Core biopsies often capture only a small portion of the tumor, which may result in underestimation of key features such as differentiation, necrosis, and proliferation, leading to undergrading. Surgical management is complicated by the RPS's tendency to involve adjacent organs. Resections are often large and en bloc, and formalin fixation can obscure anatomic landmarks, making it difficult to identify and assess true surgical margins. In addition to the standard data elements required for cancer staging, specific pathologic features of RPS should be reported to aid in prognosis and treatment planning. This position paper/consensus statement was developed by members of the Trans-Atlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG) based on evidence and expert opinion. A detailed description of specimen handling, specimen sampling, and the inclusion of the key diagnostic elements required for an accurate pathology report are provided. The aim of this manuscript is to offer a comprehensive critical reappraisal of the role of pathologic evaluation of surgical specimens in RPS surgery, as well as to propose a standard pathology report to harmonize reporting and facilitate future data collection and interpretation for future research development.