Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

13:44
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
4.2K
Web-Based Virtual Environment Versus Face-To-Face Delivery for Team-Based Learning of Anesthesia Techniques Among
Darunee Sripadungkul1, Suhattaya Boonmak1, Monsicha Somjit1
1Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Muang Khon Kaen, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
JMIR Medical Education
|January 15, 2026
Summary
Web-based virtual environments (WBVEs) for team-based learning (TBL) in anesthesiology showed similar knowledge gains compared to face-to-face (F2F) instruction. However, learner satisfaction was lower in the WBVE group, indicating a need for improved design and facilitation.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education Technology
- Anesthesiology Training
- Digital Learning Environments
Background:
- Foundational anesthesia knowledge is crucial for medical students.
- Team-based learning (TBL) enhances student engagement.
- Web-based virtual environments (WBVEs) offer real-time, instructor-guided learning for multiple participants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of WBVE versus face-to-face (F2F) delivery of a TBL curriculum.
- To evaluate postclass knowledge acquisition and learner satisfaction between WBVE and F2F TBL.
- To assess the viability of WBVEs as a scalable educational tool in medical training.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial was conducted with fifth-year medical students at a Thai medical school.
- Participants were allocated to either a Spatial platform WBVE or F2F delivery of an identical 10-section anesthesiology TBL curriculum.
- Knowledge was assessed via multiple-choice questionnaires pre- and post-session; satisfaction was measured using a 5-point Likert scale.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in postclass knowledge scores was observed between the WBVE and F2F groups (P=.12).
- Learner satisfaction significantly favored the F2F group, particularly in overall course satisfaction (P=.01).
- The study reported no adverse events or technical failures, with both delivery modes executed as planned.
Conclusions:
- WBVE-delivered TBL achieved comparable short-term knowledge gains to F2F delivery in anesthesiology.
- Lower learner satisfaction in the WBVE group highlights the need for enhanced facilitation and user experience.
- WBVEs present a scalable option for medical education, contingent on addressing design and technical readiness for optimal implementation.

