Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026
Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
Outcomes of Open Versus Arthroscopic Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair: An Updated Systematic Review and
Rajesh Kumar Rajnish1, Sandeep Kumar Yadav1, Akshant Chandel1
1Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Background:
The most effective treatment for chronic lateral ankle instability is still open lateral ankle ligament repair. However, because arthroscopic repair is less intrusive and more surgeons are choosing it, it has become more and more common. For persistent lateral ankle instability, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) was to compare the clinical results of arthroscopic and open repair.
Method:
This SRMA was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library using predefined keywords. Both prospective and retrospective studies comparing arthroscopic and open lateral ligament repair were included.
Results:
Open repair demonstrated significantly superior functional outcomes as reflected by higher AOFAS scores (MD 0.68, 95% CI 0.10-1.25; p = 0.02), Karlsson scores (MD 1.08, 95% CI 0.38-1.78; p = 0.003), and JSSF scores, along with a significantly lower incidence of knot-related pain (OR 3.81, 95% CI 1.25-11.60; p = 0.02). Although Tegner activity scores showed no significant difference (MD - 0.05, 95% CI - 0.73 to 0.62; p = 0.88), arthroscopic repair was associated with lower postoperative pain levels (VAS score: MD - 0.47, 95% CI - 0.77 to - 0.17; p = 0.002) and fewer wound-related complications (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.91; p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in overall complication rates (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58-1.20; p = 0.33), infection, nerve injury, radiological outcomes (anterior talar displacement and talar tilt), or operative duration.
Conclusion:
Current evidence indicates that open Brostrom-Gould repair yields better functional outcomes and reduces knot-related discomfort. Conversely, arthroscopic repair offers the benefits of reduced wound-related complications and superior postoperative pain control. With comparable rates of complications and operative time, arthroscopic techniques remain a viable and less invasive alternative, particularly in experienced hands.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-025-01473-8.
More Related Videos
07:24Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
Published on: January 23, 2018
04:01The Modified Single-working Portal Technique Using Lasso-loop Stitch with Needle for Arthroscopic Subscapularis Repair
Published on: August 8, 2025
