Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Multimedia Battery for Assessment of Cognitive and Basic Skills in Mathematics BM-PROMA
Published on: August 28, 2021
Psychometric Properties of Multiple-Choice Questions Used in Undergraduate Medical Education in India: A Systematic
Himel Mondal1, Amita Kumari1, Ankita Priya1
1Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND.
Abstract:
Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are widely used in Indian undergraduate medical education to assess learning. High-quality MCQs are essential for reliable and valid evaluation, yet real-world psychometric performance across Indian institutions remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically review and analyze the psychometric properties of MCQs used in the assessment of undergraduate medical students to establish normative benchmarks. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central was conducted to identify studies reporting psychometric indices of MCQs in Indian undergraduate medical education. Eligible studies included those reporting difficulty index, discrimination index, distractor efficiency, internal consistency, or point biserial correlation. Data were extracted independently by reviewers and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Fifteen studies with 17 datasets were included, covering multiple medical subjects and institutions. The pooled mean difficulty index (dataset = 15) was 51.5 (95% CI: 47.3-55.7%), the discrimination index (dataset = 14) was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.25-0.34), and distractor efficiency (dataset = 12) was 61.7% (95% CI: 45.5-77.9%). There was high heterogeneity between studies. However, no significant publication bias was detected for any psychometric parameter. This study provides the first comprehensive synthesis of MCQ performance in Indian medical education, highlighting moderate difficulty, generally acceptable discrimination, and wide variability in distractor effectiveness. These findings offer empirical evidence to establish normative benchmarks for supporting policy-making to enhance the quality of MCQ, aligned with the national average.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Cochran's Q Test
Reliability and Validity
Surveys
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

