Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

10:17
Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
Published on: October 5, 2017
9.3K
Evaluating the Quantitative Accuracy and Application of DNA Metabarcoding for Dietary Reconstruction in Ruminants
Hannah Vallin1, Mariecia Fraser2, Robin J Pakeman3
1Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS) Aberystwyth University Aberystwyth UK.
Ecology and Evolution
|January 16, 2026
Summary
DNA metabarcoding accurately identifies sheep diets but shows quantitative bias, especially with low-digestibility forage. Marker choice and digestion impact results, necessitating calibration controls for reliable herbivore diet studies.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Molecular Biology
- Animal Science
Background:
- DNA metabarcoding is a powerful tool for non-invasive dietary analysis.
- Quantitative accuracy and biases are known limitations, particularly for herbivores due to plant material.
- Understanding these limitations is crucial for accurate ecological and management applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate DNA metabarcoding accuracy for sheep diets using ITS2 and trnL markers.
- To assess the detectability and proportional representation of Medicago sativa in sheep diets.
- To identify biases associated with forage digestibility and marker choice.
Main Methods:
- Controlled feeding trials with sheep using high and low digestibility forages.
- DNA metabarcoding analysis of fecal samples using ITS2 and trnL plant DNA barcodes.
- Quantification of Medicago sativa inclusion levels (1%, 5%, 10%) and sequence read representation.
Main Results:
- ITS2 offered higher species resolution; trnL provided broader taxonomic coverage.
- Both markers differentiated diet treatments, but fecal DNA proportions deviated from vegetation input, especially with low-digestibility diets.
- Medicago sativa was detected at 1% but consistently overrepresented in sequence data.
Conclusions:
- DNA metabarcoding shows strengths and limitations for herbivore diet studies.
- Marker selection and differential digestion significantly influence quantitative accuracy.
- Multi-marker approaches and calibration are essential for reliable quantitative dietary studies in herbivores.

