Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.0K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.9K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.9K
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects01:29

Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects

290
Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...
290
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

1.3K
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
1.3K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.9K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.9K
Conduct Disorder01:28

Conduct Disorder

490
Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
490

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychedelics relax predictive processing in the post-acute period by remodeling cortico-cortical feedback circuits.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Auditory Sensitivity in Autism: A Systematic Review of Mismatch Negativity and Mismatch Field Responses.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2026
Same author

A Key Regulator of Dendritic Morphology in Supragranular Neocortex Impacts Mismatch Negativity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Sex- and etiology-specific effects on predictive processing in the inferior colliculus of two rat models of autism.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Global context rapidly shapes sensory responses in V1.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Dataset of Oddball Paradigm experiment in the Auditory Cortex and the effect of acetylcholine.

Scientific data·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.0K

Cortical deviance detection represents a canonical difference signal.

Adam Hockley1,2,3,4,5,6, Connor G Gallimore4,5, Jordan P Hamm4,5

  • 1Cognitive and Auditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience of Castilla y León (INCYL), Salamanca, Spain.

Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|January 16, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Neural responses in the auditory cortex signal prediction errors by encoding the difference between expected and actual auditory stimuli. This finding supports predictive coding theories by demonstrating a true sensory difference signal.

Keywords:
Predictive codingauditory cortexcontextdeviance detectionprediction error

More Related Videos

Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
09:00

Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex

Published on: April 15, 2015

12.8K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 18, 2026

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

6.0K
Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
09:00

Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex

Published on: April 15, 2015

12.8K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Neural processing of sensory stimuli is modulated by context.
  • Deviating stimuli typically elicit augmented neural responses, often termed "prediction errors."
  • These prediction errors may enhance salience, direct attention, or support learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether neural responses to auditory deviants represent a true "prediction error" signal.
  • To differentiate between prediction error signaling and generalized surprise or bottom-up signaling.
  • To test interpretations within the predictive coding framework.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of neural responses to auditory stimuli across different oddball paradigm variants.
  • Analysis of neuronal activity in the primary auditory cortex (A1).
  • Utilizing a fixed-deviant oddball paradigm to isolate prediction changes from input changes.

Main Results:

  • Neural responses in A1 to auditory deviants contained frequency change information.
  • A memory trace of contextual information was observed in neural responses.
  • In a fixed-deviant paradigm, neural patterns encoded the standard-to-deviant frequency difference, supporting a true difference signal.

Conclusions:

  • Deviance detection in A1 can be interpreted as a sensory prediction error.
  • This sensory prediction error reflects the difference between internal predictions and sensory input.
  • Findings align with and support the predictive coding framework.