Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Investigation of the Relationship Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and the Body Roundness Index
Nurullah Türe1, Ömer Faruk Tekin2, Onurcan Kahya1
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Kütahya, Turkey.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and a new anthropometric indicator, the body roundness index (BRI).
Method:
In this retrospective case-control study, adults with LPR (n = 89; reflux symptom index [RSI] > 13 and RFS>7) and controls (n = 94; RSI ≤ 13 and reflux finding score [RFS] ≤ 7) underwent anthropometry (body mass index [BMI]; BRI; body fat percentage [BF%]; visceral adipose tissue, [VAT]), patient-reported scales (Turkish voice handicap index-10, Turkish Eating Assessment Tool-10), and acoustic analysis (fundamental frequency, jitter%, shimmer%, harmonic-noise ratio, cepstral peak prominence smoothed [CPPS], acoustic voice quality index-3.0). Group differences were assessed with Mann-Whitney U. Multiple testing was controlled with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR). Effect sizes were summarized by Hodges-Lehmann median difference and rank-biserial correlation (r_rb).
Results:
The groups were similar in terms of age, gender, and BMI (P > 0.05). BRI showed no association with LPR (median 6.10 vs 5.20; P = 0.130; q = 0.239; r_rb = 0.13). VAT (percentage and total mass) likewise did not differ (all q ≥ 0.32). In contrast, BF% was higher in LPR overall (Δ = +2.55%; P = 0.006; q = 0.064; r_rb = 0.24), driven by men (P = 0.002; q = 0.004; r_rb = 0.40), while women showed no clear difference. Nominal acoustic differences (higher jitter%, lower CPPS) did not survive FDR correction and had small effect sizes (|r_rb|≤0.18).
Conclusion:
BRI did not discriminate LPR, and VAT estimates were likewise uninformative. In contrast, directly measured BF%, particularly in men, showed a modest association with LPR status, suggesting that simple, direct adiposity assessment may be more clinically meaningful than shape indices when evaluating patients with suspected LPR. Prospective studies should test gender-specific thresholds and incorporate objective reflux monitoring to clarify causality.
Related Concept Videos
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease I: Meaning and Pathophysiology
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration...
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding I: Inspection and Percussion
Inspection Findings
During an inspection, several findings may suggest the presence of respiratory distress or disease. Pursed-lip breathing, where exhalation is slowed by...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:

