Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
Published on: September 26, 2025
Understanding psychiatrist readiness for AI: a study of access, self-efficacy, trust, and design expectations
Yue He1, Francis Xiatian Zhang2, Xiaxia Wu3,4
1Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100088, China.
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is receiving growing attention in psychiatric practice, yet psychiatrists vary considerably in how they perceive its benefits, risks, and clinical usefulness. Successful implementation depends not only on technological performance but also on clinicians' readiness, including their access to AI, confidence in using it, trust in its reliability, and expectations for its design. Evidence on these dimensions remains limited in China.
Objective:
This study examined Chinese psychiatrists' readiness for AI across four dimensions-access, self-efficacy, trust, and design expectations-and explored variation across demographic and professional subgroups.
Method:
A cross-sectional online survey was distributed through the WeChat platform from March 20 to 22, 2025. Eligible participants were licensed psychiatrists engaged in clinical practice. A total of 134 valid responses were obtained from clinicians across diverse provinces, hospital tiers, and professional roles. Descriptive analyses and group comparisons were conducted.
Results:
Psychiatrists reported broad exposure to AI, though knowledge was largely acquired through informal rather than structured sources. Overall self-efficacy was moderate, with higher confidence observed among younger clinicians, male clinicians, and those who had received AI-related training. Trust in AI was generally positive, and department heads expressed especially strong confidence in its future role. Across subgroups, psychiatrists consistently prioritized AI applications that reduce administrative and documentation burden, while expressing lower expectations for AI use in communication, assessment, or psychotherapy.
Conclusion:
Chinese psychiatrists demonstrated cautious optimism and moderate readiness for AI. Limited access to formal training and subgroup differences in confidence highlight the need for targeted capacity-building. The strong preference for documentation-support tools underscores the importance of designing AI systems that integrate smoothly into clinical workflows while preserving the human-centered nature of psychiatric care.
More Related Videos
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Elements Crucial for Effective Psychotherapy
The Therapeutic Alliance
The therapeutic alliance refers to the relationship between the therapist and the client. The alliance strengthens when the therapist and the client engage in a nurturing, supportive, trusting, empathetic, and respectful relationship, improving therapeutic outcomes. Therapists must monitor this relationship...
Understanding the Self
Introspection
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Self-Efficacy
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy