Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Association of an Algorithm-Generated Medication Optimization Score With Clinical Outcomes in Ambulatory Patients
Mohamed S Ali1, Kaitlyn M Greer1, Sabah Ganai1
1College of Pharmac, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Insights
A new algorithm for medication optimization in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) significantly lowers mortality or hospitalization risks. This tool effectively identifies guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization opportunities in real-world heart failure care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Informatics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) implementation is often suboptimal.
- A computable algorithm was developed to generate a medication optimization score (MOS) and provide guideline-based recommendations.
- An updated algorithm version incorporating sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors was developed in 2021.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between algorithm-generated medication optimization information and clinical outcomes in real-world HFrEF patients.
- To assess the effectiveness of the updated algorithm in identifying opportunities for GDMT optimization.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 1352 ambulatory adult patients with chronic HFrEF.
- Algorithm-generated MOS calculated using electronic health record data.
- Primary outcome: composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization. Analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models, time-varying Cox models, and marginal structural models (MSM).
Main Results:
- Higher baseline MOS was associated with a lower hazard of the composite outcome (HR 0.96, p=0.040).
- Time-varying MOS showed a stronger association with reduced risk (HRs of 0.88, p<0.001).
- Event rates decreased with increasing MOS categories, and MOS improved longitudinally over time.
Conclusions:
- Higher algorithm-generated MOS values are significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality or hospitalization in HFrEF.
- The MOS values increased over the follow-up period, indicating improved medication optimization.
- The algorithm effectively identifies opportunities for GDMT optimization in real-world clinical settings.
Aims:
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) implementation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains suboptimal. A computable algorithm was developed to generate a medication optimization score (MOS) and provide guideline-based recommendations. This computable algorithm was previously validated using clinical trial data, and an updated version was developed in 2021 to include sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. This study evaluated the association between the medication optimization information generated by this version of the algorithm and clinical outcomes using real-world data.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1352 ambulatory adult patients with chronic HFrEF who received care from the advanced heart failure service at the University of Michigan between July 1, 2021, and October 14, 2024. The algorithm-generated MOS was calculated using electronic health record data. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or hospitalization. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between baseline MOS and the primary outcome. A time-varying Cox model using the running cumulative MOS and a marginal structural model (MSM) was also conducted. A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess improvement in MOS over time as the secondary outcome.
Results:
In the analysis adjusted for HF severity and comorbidities, baseline MOS was associated with a lower hazard of the composite outcome (hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.92, 0.99, p = 0.040). In the cumulative time-varying Cox model and the marginal structural model, the association with time-varying MOS became stronger, with HRs of 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.95; p = 0.0015) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93; p < 0.001), respectively. The event rates per 100 person-years were 44.1 in MOS 0%-33%, 39.5 in MOS 34%-66%, and 31.8 in MOS 67%-100%. Longitudinally, MOS improved over time.
Conclusion:
Higher algorithm-generated MOS values were significantly associated with lower all-cause mortality or hospitalization, and the MOS values increased over the follow-up period. This suggested that this algorithm effectively identifies opportunities for GDMT optimization in real-world clinical settings.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
04:05Clinical Application of Phase Angle and BIVA Z-Score Analyses in Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department with Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
03:47Workflow and Framework for Collecting and Implementing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Data in the Management of Heart Failure Patients
04:20Integration of Brain Tissue Saturation Monitoring in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Heart Failure
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations

