Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Customizing a Cryolite Glass Prosthetic Eye
Published on: October 31, 2019
Craniofacial Prosthetic Reconstruction: A 25-Year Anaplastology Experience
Ophelie Puissegur1, Allison K Vest2, Ashley Homan2
1PuissegurClinicalSolutions, LLC, Dallas, TX.
Background:
Craniofacial anaplastology provides prosthetic rehabilitation that restores form and function in patients with congenital, traumatic, or oncologic defects. Despite advances in osseointegration and material science, large-scale data describing adult populations remain limited.
Objective:
To characterize the demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic features of adult patients treated at a tertiary anaplastology center and evaluate whether socioeconomic status influences service utilization or outcomes.
Materials And Methods:
A retrospective review was conducted of 1057 adult patients treated over 25 years, of whom 333 received at least one auricular prosthesis. Variables included age, sex, diagnosis, laterality, implant use, mortality, and geographic distribution. Residential ZIP codes were classified as high-, middle-, or low-income using state and national benchmarks. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using χ2 testing, and continuous-ordinal relationships with Spearman's rank correlation.
Results:
The mean age was 52.1 years. Auricular defects accounted for 30.8% of all cases, with males comprising 76.3%. Diagnoses included congenital microtia (38.1%), trauma (33.3%), and cancer-related defects (28.6%), with squamous cell carcinoma representing the most common oncologic cause (12.9%). Laterality was right in 49.8%, left in 40.0%, and bilateral in 10.2%. Implants were used in 43.6% of cases. No significant differences were observed in prosthetic service utilization (χ2=1.89, P=0.388) or mortality (χ2=0.16, P=0.92) across earning classes.
Conclusions:
Adult anaplastology serves a diverse population spanning congenital, traumatic, and oncologic etiologies. Socioeconomic status was not associated with receipt of prosthetic services, implant use, or mortality, indicating equitable outcomes once specialized care is accessed.
Related Concept Videos
08:04Customizing a Cryolite Glass Prosthetic Eye
07:23Electroporation of Craniofacial Mesenchyme
06:58A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
02:46Immunostaining of Mouse Craniofacial Tissues
10:42A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
09:14Surface Electromyographic Biofeedback as a Rehabilitation Tool for Patients with Global Brachial Plexus Injury Receiving Bionic Reconstruction

