Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

07:23
A Protocol for Genetic Induction and Visualization of Benign and Invasive Tumors in Cephalic Complexes of Drosophila melanogaster
Published on: September 11, 2013
9.9K
Genetic and environmental interactions outweigh mitonuclear coevolution for complex traits in Drosophila
Biorxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
|January 19, 2026
Summary
Mitochondrial and nuclear genomes interact, influencing complex traits and evolution. Studying Drosophila reveals how genetic and environmental factors maintain variation, with implications for mitochondrial replacement therapies.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Genetics
- Genomics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation is crucial for phenotypic evolution due to epistatic interactions with the nuclear genome.
- Understanding the interplay between nuclear and mitochondrial genomes is key to deciphering complex trait evolution.
- Quantifying selection pressures (stabilizing and directional) on complex traits is a central challenge in evolutionary genetics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the contributions of mitochondrial, nuclear, and environmental factors to complex traits.
- To investigate the role of mitonuclear genotype-by-environment interactions in maintaining genetic variation.
- To assess the impact of within-species versus between-species mitochondrial variation on trait architecture.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a panel of 90 Drosophila mitonuclear genotypes.
- Assessed four metabolically demanding complex traits.
- Exposed flies to rotenone (a mitochondrial Complex I inhibitor) to study genotype-by-environment interactions.
Main Results:
- Observed stronger mitonuclear interaction effects with within-species mitochondrial variation, suggesting stabilizing selection.
- Identified significant genotype x environment (GxE and GxGxE) interactions when flies were cultured on rotenone.
- Demonstrated that both nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, along with environmental factors, contribute to complex traits.
Conclusions:
- Mitonuclear interactions play a significant role in shaping complex traits and maintaining genetic variation.
- Environmental factors, such as rotenone exposure, reveal complex genetic interactions.
- Findings suggest that mitochondrial DNA donors with longer purifying selection histories may be safer for mitochondrial replacement therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Polygenic Traits
68.9K
When more than one gene is responsible for a given phenotype, the trait is considered polygenic. Human height is a polygenic trait. Studies have uncovered hundreds of loci that influence height, and there are believed to be many more. Due to the high number of genes involved, as well as environmental and nutritional factors, height varies significantly within a given population. The distribution of height forms a bell-shaped curve, with relatively few individuals in the population at the...
68.9K
07:23A Protocol for Genetic Induction and Visualization of Benign and Invasive Tumors in Cephalic Complexes of Drosophila melanogaster
9.9K
Cooperation between an activated oncogene like RASV12 and mutations in cell polarity genes like scribbled, result in tumor growth in Drosophila where tumor cells also display invasive behaviors. Here a simple protocol for the induction and observation of the benign and invasive tumors is...
9.9K
An Overview of Genetic Analysis
44.2K
An organism’s physical traits, or phenotype, are a product of its genotype, which is the combination of alleles (gene variants) inherited from its parents. To varying degrees, genes interact with each other and environmental factors to generate traits. The distribution of alleles and traits within a population is influenced by a number of factors, including natural selection, migration, and random genetic drift.In this video, JoVE introduces some of the foundational discoveries in...
44.2K
Multiple Allele Traits
38.0K
The Concept of Multiple Allelism
38.0K
Trait and State Self-Esteem
11.4K
The term self-esteem is often used generically, to refer to how people feel about themselves. However, according to research, there are three distinct constructs that should not be used interchangeably (Brown & Marshall, 2006).
11.4K
Predator-Prey Interactions
21.1K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
21.1K
