Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
Cardiovascular disease risk prediction in multi-ethnic Asian populations: evidence from two population-based cohorts
Charlie G Y Lim1, Crystal C Y Chong2, Yvonne H M Wong1
1Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 12 Science Drive 2, 117549, Singapore.
Background:
The rising burden of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in Asia requires risk assessment tools tailored to Asian populations. Therefore, we recalibrated the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations for non-Hispanic Whites (PCE-W) and compared its performance in predicting 10-year CVD risk with two other established CVD prediction models that have been recently recalibrated for Asian populations.
Methods:
We used data from the Singapore Multi-Ethnic Cohort (MEC1) and the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases (SEED) cohort comprising ethnic Chinese, Indian, and Malay participants. The PCE-W was recalibrated using data from MEC1, externally validated in the SEED cohort, and compared against the Singapore-modified Framingham Risk Score (SG-FRS-2023) and the SCORE2 Asia-Pacific model using the concordance index (C-index). Calibration was assessed using the calibration-in-the-large method, the calibration slope, and a goodness-of-fit test.
Findings:
All three models demonstrated possibly helpful to clearly useful discrimination in MEC1 and SEED, with overall C-indices ranging from 0.728 to 0.811. The recalibrated PCE-W outperformed the original PCE-W in MEC1 and SEED, although some misestimations remained among Chinese men and women and Malay women (calibration-in-the-large ranged from -0.479 to 0.260). The SG-FRS-2023 displayed generally satisfactory calibration across both MEC1 and SEED but tended to overestimate risk in Chinese (calibration-in-the-large -0.671) and Indian men (calibration-in-the-large -0.214) in the SEED cohort. The SCORE2 Asia-Pacific model performed satisfactorily among Indians but overestimated risk in Chinese (calibration-in-the-large ranged from -0.570 to -1.185) and showed poor model fit in Malays.
Interpretation:
The recalibrated PCE-W, SG-FRS-2023, and SCORE2 Asia-Pacific model demonstrated possibly helpful to clearly useful discrimination across two multi-ethnic cohorts in Singapore. In terms of calibration, the recalibrated PCE-W and SG-FRS-2023, both recalibrated using local data, performed better than the SCORE2 Asia-Pacific model. Our study supports the use of the established CVD prediction models in Asian populations following appropriate local recalibration.
Funding:
This work was supported by the Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council and the Singapore Biomedical Research Council.
Related Concept Videos
06:04Pulse-Wave Velocity, Flow-Mediated Dilation, and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness to Assess Cardiovascular Risk in Population with Metabolic Syndrome
Conservation of Small Populations
20:36Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling
11:10Genotypic Inference of HIV-1 Tropism Using Population-based Sequencing of V3
What is Population Genetics?
Population Growth

