Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Porcine As a Training Module for Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction
Published on: September 29, 2018
Perioperative laboratory profiles predict complications after extensive head and neck reconstruction: a
Tatjana Khromov1,2, Simon Breier1, Ulrich Stefenelli3
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Introduction:
Surgical reconstruction of head and neck defects after oncological resection is a complex procedure often associated with unpredictable postoperative complications. Hence, laboratory parameter profiles are of considerable interest as potential perioperative predictors.
Methods:
This retrospective study analyzed a comprehensive set of laboratory parameters in 233 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) who underwent tumor resection and reconstruction.
Results:
The overall complication rate was 30%, with wound dehiscence (12.4%), pulmonary embolism (PE, 11.6%), and surgical revision (10.3%) being the most common complications. Dynamic analysis of perioperative laboratory parameters from one week before to 49 days after surgery revealed that patients who developed complications showed less pronounced decreases in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and erythrocyte levels. These patients also exhibited altered coagulation and electrolyte profiles. Statistical analysis using logistic regression identified hematocrit slope as independent predictor. Meanwhile, random forest modeling highlighted INR and aPTT as key markers. Subgroup analysis showed that PE, the most clinically significant complication, was associated with abnormal potassium, urea, and protein profiles. Whereas a therapy-related increase in aPTT was observed postoperatively, INR alterations were already evident preoperatively. Conversely, local complications such as wound dehiscence, surgical revision, and graft failure were more strongly associated with deteriorating hematological parameters.
Discussion:
Given their multifactorial nature, influenced by comorbidities, tumor biology, and perioperative management, these findings highlight the need for longitudinal laboratory monitoring and prospective validation in controlled settings. Integrating dynamic laboratory trends into multimodal prediction models may facilitate earlier risk stratification and improve individualized perioperative management in head and neck reconstructive surgery.
Related Concept Videos
07:43Porcine As a Training Module for Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction
Arteries of the Head and Neck
The internal carotid arteries supply blood to the anterior portion of the cerebrum. They enter the...
Veins of Head and Neck
On the other hand, the vertebral veins, unlike their arterial counterparts, are not primarily responsible for brain drainage. Instead, they drain the cervical vertebrae, spinal cord, and some small...
Social Proof
08:59A Model for Perineural Invasion in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
08:05A Pre-clinical Rat Model for the Study of Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Reconstructive Microsurgery
