Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 20, 2026

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Interfacility Collaboration for Hemophilia Care in Japan: A Retrospective Database Study Using a Japanese Healthcare
Ei Kinai1, Masako Yamaguchi2, Akira Shirahata3
1Department of Laboratory Medicine Tokyo Medical University Tokyo Japan.
Interfacility collaboration (IFC) for hemophilia A care in Japan remains low, with few patients receiving specialized tests or procedures at expert centers. Strengthening IFC is crucial to improve care for patients with hemophilia A.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Approximately 6000 patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) in Japan receive care across numerous facilities.
- Interfacility collaboration (IFC) between hemophilia treatment centers and satellite facilities is vital to reduce care disparities.
- The Japan Hemophilia Network Committee (JHNC) was established to facilitate IFC, but its effectiveness is unproven.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of IFC for hemophilia A care in Japan.
- To evaluate the provision of specialized hemophilia care at non-expert facilities.
- To identify areas for improvement in the care delivery network for PwHA.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, longitudinal, observational study using the JMDC Claims Database (April 2013-March 2023).
- Patients with hemophilia A were categorized into those usually treated at non-expert (N=82) versus expert (N=97) facilities.
- Hemophilia-specific care was assessed via joint examinations and blood coagulation tests, adhering to STROBE guidelines.
Main Results:
- Patients at non-expert facilities showed persistently low rates of hemophilia-specific tests at expert facilities (6.9%-16.3% for joint exams, 15.4%-32.6% for coagulation tests).
- Visits to expert facilities did not increase for the non-expert group during the study period.
- A low proportion (<20%) of invasive procedures with bleeding risks were performed at expert facilities, with some specialist procedures occurring at non-expert sites.
Conclusions:
- Current IFC for hemophilia A care in Japan is insufficient.
- There is a significant need to enhance collaboration between non-expert and expert hemophilia care facilities.
- Improved IFC is essential to ensure comprehensive and specialized care for all PwHA.
Related Concept Videos
05:02Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
11:18Generation of Comprehensive Thoracic Oncology Database - Tool for Translational Research
09:00TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
09:43Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering
12:05Database-guided Flow-cytometry for Evaluation of Bone Marrow Myeloid Cell Maturation
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:

