Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
S-ICD in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Fewer Complications Without Increased Inappropriate Shocks Versus Transvenous
Christopher Monkhouse1,2, James Malcolmson1,2, Edward Maclean1,2
1Barts Heart Centre, West Smithfield, London, UK.
Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD) show fewer complications in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients compared to transvenous ICDs (TV-ICD). Multi-event analysis confirms reduced cumulative complication risk with S-ICDs, offering a potentially better benefit/risk ratio.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients face long-term risks with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), including complications and inappropriate therapy (IT).
- Subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICDs) eliminate vascular risks of transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs), but IT rates remain a concern.
- Assessing cumulative complication risk is crucial for optimizing ICD selection in HCM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare complication rates and cumulative risk between S-ICDs and TV-ICDs in HCM patients.
- To evaluate the impact of device type on therapy rates and mortality.
- To provide a novel assessment of cumulative complication burden using multi-event analysis.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective observational study of 611 HCM patients receiving ICDs (2006-2022).
- Comparative outcome analysis using Cox proportional hazard models and multi-event statistical models.
- Propensity score matching to adjust for baseline differences.
Main Results:
- S-ICD recipients (n=141) experienced significantly fewer complications than TV-ICD recipients (HR 0.309, p=0.035).
- Multi-event analysis revealed a cumulative increase in complications for TV-ICDs (HR 0.258, p=0.004), with no multiple complications in S-ICD patients.
- No significant differences in therapy rates or mortality were observed between matched groups.
Conclusions:
- S-ICDs are associated with fewer complications compared to TV-ICDs in HCM patients, a finding amplified by multi-event analysis.
- Despite similar inappropriate therapy rates, S-ICDs may offer an improved benefit/risk ratio.
- Shared decision-making regarding S-ICD use should be encouraged for HCM patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management

