Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
Getting to Know Pain Effect Sizes-Guidelines for Effect Size and Sample Size in Global Pain Research
1Department of Sports Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Objectives:
To explore potential reference thresholds for individual and group differences in pain research. An additional objective was to examine possible variations in these thresholds across geographic regions and to provide indicative estimates of the sample sizes that may be required to detect given effect sizes at specified levels of statistical power.
Design:
Data were exported from 6 key journals in the field of pain.
Setting:
Data were collected from 6 journals with the highest H-index according to the Scimago Journal & Country Rank database in the category of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.
Participants:
In total, 130 meta-analyses were identified, from which 5294 effect size measures were extracted, encompassing a total of 1,071,577 participants.
Interventions:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures:
Empirically derived effect size thresholds intended to support more nuanced interpretation of individual and group differences in pain research, with consideration of potential regional variability across populations.
Results:
Effect size thresholds were established based on percentiles, with small, medium, and large effects rounded to 0.10, 0.30, and 0.40 for correlations and 0.70 for group differences, respectively. Regional analyses revealed notable geographic variation, with the strongest large effects found in Asia and the weakest across studies conducted in North America.
Conclusions:
Researchers may consider using approximate reference values of 0.10, 0.30, and 0.40 for individual differences (Pearson's r) and 0.10, 0.30, and 0.70 for group differences (Cohen's d or Hedges' g) as tentative interpretive guidelines for small, medium, and large effects in pain research, alongside appropriate sample size planning. For studies conducted within relatively homogeneous populations on individual continents, the following exploratory thresholds may be considered: Africa (0.10, 0.40, and 1.00); Asia (0.10, 0.40, and 1.40); Australia (0.20, 0.40, and 0.80); Europe (0.10, 0.30, and 0.70); North America (0.10, 0.20, and 0.50); South America (0.10, 0.40, and 0.80).
Related Concept Videos
Sample Size Calculation
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Cell Size
Surface Area
Cells can take in nutrients and water via diffusion through the plasma membrane itself or through specific channels in the membrane. The area of the membrane surrounding...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes
Brick Sizes
Modular bricks are the most common type and are sized to include the mortar joint, which is essential for...
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

