How do clinician and parent-reported data differ? An analysis of similarity and difference in the datasets from a

Karen Jaqueline Low1,2, Huw Day3, Mevmi Lasanya Kodippuli Thanthilla4

  • 1Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK karen.low@bristol.ac.uk.

PubMed

Insights

Parent-reported data captures common childhood issues, while clinician-reported data offers detailed clinical phenotypes for neurodevelopmental disorders. Understanding these differences is crucial for research and data interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and genomics
  • Clinical phenotyping
  • Data science in healthcare

Background:

  • Parent/patient-reported data (PRD) offers accessible phenotypic information for monogenic neurodevelopmental disorders.
  • The concordance between PRD and clinical data requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the quantity, detail, and similarity of parent-reported data (PRD) versus clinician-reported data (CRD) in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.
  • To assess data concordance across different body systems, genes, and gene groups.

Main Methods:

  • The GenROC study involved 547 children with parallel PRD (web questionnaires) and CRD (Human Phenotype Ontology proformas).
  • Data sources were compared per participant by system, gene, and gene group, analyzing quantity, detail, and similarity.
  • Similarity scores were calculated overall and for specific systems and genes.

Main Results:

  • PRD yielded more terms for dental, gastroenterology, immunology, respiratory systems, and vision.
  • CRD provided greater detail for most gene subgroups, combined systems, and neurology.
  • Overall similarity scores were low (mean 0.38), with highest similarity in cardiac data (mean 0.74) and lowest in Ear/Nose/Throat (ENT) (mean 0.34).
  • Clinician-reported data (CRD) showed higher similarity to published syndromic phenotypes.

Conclusions:

  • Parents report common childhood conditions, whereas clinicians describe specific clinical features like brain morphology and seizures.
  • Recognizing the distinct strengths and limitations of PRD and CRD is essential for designing studies and interpreting data in neurodevelopmental disorders.
  • This understanding aids in optimizing the use of diverse phenotypic datasets.
Abstract

Keywords:
Phenotype

Related Concept Videos

Data Reporting and Recording01:24

Data Reporting and Recording

Reporting and recording are crucial in data documentation. The timely, thorough, and accurate documentation of facts is essential when recording patient data. Failure to record findings during an assessment or interpretation of a problem will result in loss of information and make the patient document unreliable. The reader is left with general impressions if the information is not specific. A recording is documenting data of the individual's health information in a traceable, secure, and...
5.3K
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.4K
Crossing Over01:34

Crossing Over

Unlike mitosis, meiosis aims for genetic diversity in its creation of haploid gametes. Dividing germ cells first begin this process in prophase I, where each chromosome—replicated in S phase—is now composed of two sister chromatids (identical copies) joined centrally.
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...
169.3K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

Overview
238.8K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
261
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

Overview
80.9K