Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

A Data-Driven Approach to Quantifying Immune States in Sepsis
Published on: February 7, 2025
Straight to Phase III: Model-Informed Approach Speeds Depemokimab Clinical Development in Interleukin-5-Driven
Chiara Zecchin1, Stein Schalkwijk2, Isabelle J Pouliquen3
1Clinical Pharmacology Modelling and Simulation, GSK, Stevenage, UK.
Abstract:
IL-5, a key mediator of type 2 inflammation, underlies various diseases, including severe asthma, CRSwNP, EGPA, and HES. Reduction in blood eosinophil count (BEC), a biomarker of IL-5 activity, is commonly used to evaluate the efficacy of anti-IL-5 biologic therapies. Model-informed drug development (MIDD) and quantitative decision making (QDM) were used to shorten the clinical development of depemokimab (an ultra-long-acting anti-IL-5 biologic). A Bayesian nonlinear mixed effects dose-time response model predicted the depemokimab dose in severe asthma achieving comparable BEC reductions to those observed in mepolizumab (an approved anti-IL-5 biologic) Phase III MUSCA and MENSA trials. Prespecified QDM go/no-go criteria were applied to assess success probability. Phase IIb efficacy-based trial simulations were conducted using negative binomial distribution to simulate individual annualized exacerbation rate. A depemokimab PK/PD (BEC) model predicted Phase III trial doses in CRSwNP/EGPA/HES. Single depemokimab doses were well-described by the Bayesian model; a single depemokimab dose ≥ 60 mg had probability ≥ 80% of exceeding Minimum (78%; MUSCA) and ≥ 10% probability of exceeding Target (84%; MENSA) values for trough BEC reduction from baseline vs. placebo. Clinical trial simulations demonstrated < 3% probability of more precise estimation of the Phase III dosing regimen with a conventional efficacy-based dose-ranging study. Depemokimab 100 mg for severe asthma/CRSwNP and 200 mg for EGPA/HES, administered subcutaneously every 26 weeks, were selected for Phase III trials. MIDD and QDM shortened the depemokimab development program by 2-3 years, emphasizing the potential of this approach for progressing new therapies from Phase I directly to Phase III.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
ATP Driven Pumps III: V-type Pumps
The peripheral or cytosolic V1 domain with eight subunits is involved in ATP hydrolysis. The integral or transmembrane V0 domain containing at least five subunits...
Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment

