Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018
Probabilistic proton treatment planning: a novel approach for optimizing underdosage and overdosage probabilities of
J R de Jong1, S Breedveld2, S J M Habraken3,4
1Department of Radiation, Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, section Medical Physics and Technology, Mekelweg 15, Delft, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Objective. Uncertainties in treatment planning are typically managed using either margin-based or robust optimization. Margin-based methods expand the clinical target volume (CTV) towards a planning target volume, which is generally unsuited for proton therapy. Robust optimization considers worst-case scenarios, but its quality depends on the chosenuncertainty (scenario) set: excluding extremes reduces robustness, while including too many make plans overly conservative. Probabilistic optimization overcomes these limitations by modeling a continuous scenario distribution, enabling the use of statistical measures.Approach. We propose a novel approach to probabilistic optimization that steers plans towards individualized probability levels, to control CTV and organs-at-risks (OARs) under- and overdosage. Voxel-wise dose percentiles (d) are estimated by expected value (E) and standard deviation (SD) asE±δ⋅SD, whereδis iteratively tuned to match the target percentile of the underlying probability distribution (given setup and range uncertainties). The approach involves an inner optimization ofE±δ⋅SDfor fixedδ, and an outer optimization loop that updatesδ. Polynomial chaos expansion provides accurate and efficient dose estimates during optimization. We validated the method on a spherical CTV (prescribed 60 Gy) abutted by an OAR in different directions and a horseshoe-shaped CTV surrounding a cylindrical spine, under Gaussian-distributed setup (3 mm) and range (3%) uncertainties.Main results. For spherical cases with similar CTV coverage,P(D2%>30Gy)dropped by 10%-15%; for matched OAR dose,P(D98%>57Gy)increased by 67.5%-71%. In spinal plans,P(D98%>57Gy)increased by 10%-15% whileP(D2%>30Gy)dropped by 24%-28% in the same plan. Probabilistic and robust optimization times were comparable for spherical (hours) but longer for spinal cases (7.5-11.5 h vs 9-20 min).Significance. Compared to discrete scenario-based optimization, the probabilistic approach offered better OAR sparing or target coverage, depending on individualized priorities.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Probability Laws
Structure and Organization of Smooth Muscles
Structure of smooth muscle cell
Smooth muscle cells are spindle-shaped with tapering ends and a...
Prokaryotic Gene Structure and Organization
Probability in Statistics
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
Probability Histograms
Probability Distributions
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson...

