Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

In Vivo Measurement of Hindlimb Dorsiflexor Isometric Torque from Pig
Published on: September 3, 2021
Modeling, Evaluation, and In Vivo Estimation of Muscle Cell Diameter With the Random Permeable Barrier Model:
Martijn Froeling1, Roosmarijn Brenninkmeijer2, Danny R van der Woude2
1Center for Image Sciences, Department of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
The random permeable barrier model (RPBM) can estimate muscle cell size and permeability. This study found sex influences cell diameter, but RPBM parameters don't correlate with muscle strength in healthy adults.
Area of Science:
- Biophysics
- Muscle Physiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- The random permeable barrier model (RPBM) analyzes water diffusion in muscle tissue to assess microstructure.
- Limited research exists on RPBM fitting stability, limitations, and its relationship with conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics and functional outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively evaluate the RPBM's forward and inverse behavior through simulations and model fitting.
- To quantify muscle cell diameters in healthy adults and investigate relationships between RPBM-derived parameters, DTI metrics, subject characteristics, and muscle function.
Main Methods:
- Simulations were used to analyze RPBM forward behavior.
- Model fitting was employed to assess inverse behavior and parameter stability.
- Muscle cell diameters were quantified across six muscle groups in 100 healthy adults.
Main Results:
- Simulations revealed that stable RPBM estimates for cell diameter and membrane permeability require constrained parameters, particularly and a fixed (0.9 axial diffusivity).
- In vivo, significant differences in muscle cell diameter were observed across muscle groups, with men consistently having larger diameters than women.
- No significant correlation was found between peak torque and muscle cell diameter or membrane permeability.
Conclusions:
- The RPBM is a valuable tool for assessing muscle microstructure, complementing DTI metrics.
- Careful consideration of modeling limitations is crucial for accurate RPBM application in muscle health studies.
- Sex is a significant determinant of muscle cell diameter, independent of anthropometric factors.
More Related Videos
10:56Endothelial Cell Transcytosis Assay as an In Vitro Model to Evaluate Inner Blood-Retinal Barrier Permeability
Published on: June 7, 2022
14:10Isometric and Eccentric Force Generation Assessment of Skeletal Muscles Isolated from Murine Models of Muscular Dystrophies
Published on: January 31, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions
Isotonic contractions
Isotonic contractions occur when a muscle changes length while...
Modeling of Diode Forward Characteristics
Modeling of Diode Reverse Characteristics
When a reverse voltage applied to a Zener diode exceeds its breakdown voltage, the diode enters the breakdown region. At this point, the...
Specialized Characteristics of Cardiac Muscles
Cardiac muscle cells are smaller than skeletal muscles, averaging 10–20 mm in diameter and 50–100 mm in length. However, they have large energy demands for continuous contraction and relaxation. This energy is almost exclusively derived from aerobic metabolism of energy...
Theories of Dissolution: The Danckwerts' Model and Interfacial Barrier Model
Torque
Torque can be considered as the rotational counterpart to force. Since forces change the translational...