Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Surgically Induced Cardiac Volume Overload by Aortic Regurgitation in Mouse
Published on: August 30, 2022
Optimization of echocardiographic quantification of aortic regurgitation against CMR: novel algorithm development and
Tom Kai Ming Wang1,2, Richard Grimm1,2, Zoran Popovic1,2
1Section of Cardiovascular Imaging, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue (Cleveland Clinic Main Campus J1-5), Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Aims:
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) compliments transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for heart valve evaluation, however TTE remains more widely available. We sought to optimize TTE quantification of significant aortic regurgitation (AR) by developing TTE-based algorithms to identify CMR-defined severe AR.
Methods And Results:
Patients with moderate-to-severe AR undergoing both TTE and CMR within 3-months were studied. A historical cohort 2006-18 (n = 193) was used to derive TTE-based decision tree regression algorithms to best identify severe AR based on holodiastolic flow reversal (HDR) using CMR, then validated in a prospective AR cohort (n = 97) during 2019-21.Mean AR regurgitant volumes, fractions, and proportions with HDR by TTE/CMR were 48/31 mL, 41/25%, and 43%/27% for the historical derivation cohort and 51/37 mL, 47/29%, and 54%/41% for the prospective validation cohort. Decision-tree analyses found regurgitant volume ≥ 45 mL and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) ≥ 93 mL/m2 by TTE to best identify CMR-derived severe AR. Areas under curves (95%CIs) of the novel algorithms (proximal isovelocity surface area and Doppler methods) compared with current guidelines criteria for detecting CMR-derived severe AR were 0.80 (0.71-0.88) and 0.74 (0.65-0.83) vs. 0.72 (0.63-0.81) in the derivation cohort, and 0.76 (0.66-0.87) and 0.71 (0.61-0.82) vs. 0.58 (0.46-0.70) in the validation cohort; and for predicting left ventricular remodelling where follow-up TTE wad available were 0.65 (0.58-0.73) and 0.62 (0.55-0.70) vs. 0.53 (0.45-0.61), respectively.
Conclusion:
Novel TTEs algorithm increased TTE accuracy of identifying significant AR defined by CMR especially in the prospective cohort, compared to the current guidelines criteria, and was able to modestly discriminate LV remodelling.
More Related Videos
11:16In vitro Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Using Four-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: February 25, 2022
09:05Assessment of Cardiac Morphological and Functional Changes in Mouse Model of Transverse Aortic Constriction by Echocardiographic Imaging
Published on: June 21, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation
Reliability and Validity