Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Oral Biofilm Sampling for Microbiome Analysis in Healthy Children
Published on: December 31, 2017
Salivary Microbiome Differences in Stunted and Healthy Children: A Metagenomic Analysis
Nila Kasuma1, Haria Fitri1, Reno Wiska Wulandari1
1Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia.
Abstract:
This study aimed to compare the composition and diversity of the salivary microbiome in stunted and nonstunted children using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to explore the relationship between nutritional status and oral microbiota.A total of 20 saliva samples were collected from children aged 6 to 10 years, comprising two groups: stunted (n = 10) and healthy controls (n = 10). Deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted, and the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced. Bioinformatics analysis included taxonomic assignment, calculation of relative abundance, α diversity (using Shannon and Simpson indices), β diversity (UniFrac-based principal coordinate analysis and permutational multivariate analysis of variance [PERMANOVA]), and differential abundance testing using the Mann-Whitney U test.The dominant phyla in both groups were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidota, with Proteobacteria being more prevalent in the stunted group. At the genus level, Neisseria and Veillonella were more abundant in stunted children. Notably, Veillonella was significantly elevated in the stunted group (28.6%) compared with controls (14.9%, p = 0.0376). Alpha diversity indices revealed a higher diversity trend in the stunted group, although this difference was not statistically significant (Shannon, p = 0.130; Simpson, p = 0.762). Beta diversity analysis revealed no considerable clustering between groups (PERMANOVA p > 0.05), indicating moderate interindividual variability but no clear group separation.Children with stunted growth demonstrated distinct microbial signatures in their salivary microbiota, particularly in the increased abundance of Proteobacteria and Veillonella, suggesting a potential link between chronic undernutrition and oral microbial dysbiosis. These findings underscore the need for additional studies to investigate the impact of nutritional status on oral and systemic health through the microbiome axis.
Related Concept Videos
Salivary Glands and Saliva
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...

