Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
Radiographic medial posterior tibial slope ≥16° predicts multiple revisions after anterior cruciate ligament
Mahmut Enes Kayaalp1,2,3, Jumpei Inoue1,4, Efstathios Konstantinou1,5
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Purpose:
An increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) has been implicated as a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure. This matched case-control study aimed to compare radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based PTS measurements between patients undergoing multiple revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and those with successful primary ACLR and to identify thresholds predictive of high revision risk.
Methods:
In this matched case-control study, 156 patients were analysed: 78 patients undergoing multiple revision ACLR and 78 patients with successful primary ACLR. Medial PTS was measured on radiographs, while medial, lateral and PTS difference (PTS asymmetry) were measured on MRI. Group differences were assessed using independent t tests and χ 2 tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified optimal thresholds, and logistic regression quantified odds ratios (ORs) for multiple revisions per 1° increase in radiographic medial PTS, adjusting for body mass index (BMI), sex, side, height and weight.
Results:
Radiographic medial PTS was significantly higher in the multiple-revision group (12.5 ± 3.5° vs. 11.2 ± 3.0°, p = 0.016). ROC analysis identified an optimal medial PTS cutoff of 13° (area under the curve = 0.58, sensitivity = 0.49, specificity = 0.65), but only a PTS ≥ 16° was significantly associated with increased multiple revision risk (OR = 3.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-8.40; p = 0.037; specificity = 0.91; positive predictive value [PPV] = 0.70). MRI-based medial and lateral PTSs, as well as PTS asymmetry, did not differ significantly between groups. Univariate logistic regression demonstrated a 10% increase in odds per 1° increase in radiographic PTS (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00-1.22, p = 0.049), remaining significant after adjustment for BMI, sex, side, height and weight (adjusted OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.23, p = 0.034). Radiographic medial PTS correlated moderately with MRI-based medial PTS (r = 0.49, p < 0.001), but not with lateral PTS (p: n.s.).
Conclusion:
Radiographic medial PTS showed the strongest differentiation between successful primary ACLR and multiple-revision ACLR. A PTS ≥ 16° identifies patients at significantly higher risk of multiple revisions, whereas MRI-based medial PTS, lateral PTS and PTS asymmetry provide no additional discriminatory value. Radiographic medial PTS appears practical for preoperative risk stratification, whereas MRI-based measures do not show similar utility.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III.
Related Concept Videos
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors
In contrast, source traits are the...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Muscles of the Anterior Neck
Multiple Allele Traits
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...

