Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.7K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.0K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.0K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Adjusting a Traverse01:12

Adjusting a Traverse

374
In the site survey of a four-sided traverse, internal angles are essential to ensure geometric accuracy. The survey revealed that the sum of the measured internal angles was 359 degrees and 48 minutes, which is 12 minutes less than the expected 360 degrees. This discrepancy signals an error likely arising from measurement inaccuracies during the fieldwork.To rectify this error, the adjustment process involved distributing the 12-minute shortfall equally across the four internal angles. By...
374
Diode: Forward bias01:20

Diode: Forward bias

2.1K
In semiconductor devices, diodes play a crucial role in directing current flow, and its operation is primarily categorized into forward bias and reverse bias. A diode is said to be forward-biased when its p-type region is connected to the positive terminal of a battery and its n-type region is linked to the negative terminal. This configuration reduces the potential barrier within the diode, allowing current to flow easily from the p to the n-type region.
The behavior of a diode in forward bias...
2.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Reliability of lung ultrasound in adult patients in emergency and intensive care settings: a systematic review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same author

Evaluating data extraction error by a large language model from randomised controlled trials: a large-scale empirical study.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Leveling the playing field: supporting authors from resource-limited settings to conduct and publish systematic reviews in JBI Evidence Synthesis.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same author

The inclusion or exclusion of studies based on critical appraisal results in JBI qualitative systematic reviews: An analysis of practices.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Evidence synthesis methodology for questions relating to barriers and enablers in health care: a scoping review.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same author

Data analysis and presentation methods in umbrella reviews/overviews of reviews in health care: A cross-sectional study.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Innovations in communication between patients, caregivers, health care providers, and trainees in inpatient pediatrics: a scoping review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same journal

Oral health interventions for UK-based Bengali children and their families: a scoping review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same journal

Integrated service strategies for women experiencing intimate partner violence and substance use problems: a scoping review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of suture button fixation versus screw fixation for the management of acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same journal

Post-elimination trachoma surveillance and integration into primary health systems: a scoping review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.6K

Bias-adjusted meta-analysis using the quality effects model: a Stata tutorial.

Jennifer C Stone1, Cindy Stern1, Romy Menghao Jia1

  • 1JBI, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

JBI Evidence Synthesis
|January 21, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces the quality effects (QE) model for bias-adjusted meta-analysis. It provides a step-by-step guide for researchers to implement this method in Stata, improving the reliability of synthesized evidence.

Keywords:
Statabiasmeta-analysisquality adjustmentquality effects

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

77.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.6K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

77.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Traditional meta-analysis synthesizes study effect sizes but often overlooks systematic error.
  • Bias-adjusted meta-analysis models have been developed to address this limitation.
  • The quality effects (QE) model specifically uses methodological quality assessments to adjust pooled estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a step-by-step guide for implementing the quality effects (QE) model in Stata.
  • To demonstrate the application of the QE model for bias-adjusted meta-analysis.
  • To assist researchers in enhancing the validity of synthesized evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Stata metan package for meta-analysis.
  • Applied the quality effects (QE) model for bias adjustment.
  • Detailed a procedural walkthrough for researchers.

Main Results:

  • The QE model offers a structured approach to adjust meta-analytic estimates based on study quality.
  • The Stata implementation facilitates practical application of bias-adjusted meta-analysis.
  • Researchers can improve the accuracy of pooled effect sizes by accounting for methodological quality.

Conclusions:

  • The quality effects (QE) model is a valuable tool for conducting bias-adjusted meta-analyses.
  • Implementing the QE model in Stata enhances the rigor of evidence synthesis.
  • This approach helps mitigate bias and improve the reliability of meta-analytic findings.