Validating CALIPER pediatric reference intervals in a U.S. population using retrospective outpatient data and
Jillian Kodger1, Thomas J S Durant2, Nalan Yurtsever1
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry
|January 21, 2026
Summary
The RefineR method shows better alignment with Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) than CLSI guidelines for pediatric lab results. This approach is more accurate for diverse US pediatric outpatient populations.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Laboratory Medicine
- Pediatric Reference Interval Development
- Biostatistics in Healthcare
Background:
- Accurate pediatric reference intervals (RIs) are crucial for interpreting lab results but face challenges like physiological variation and limited sample sizes.
- This study assesses the applicability of Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) RIs in a diverse US pediatric outpatient setting.
- Two methods, RefineR inverse modeling and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP28-A3c, were used for evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the applicability of existing Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Pediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) to a US pediatric outpatient population.
- To compare the performance of the RefineR inverse modeling approach versus the CLSI EP28-A3c recommended approach for deriving pediatric reference intervals.
- To assess the accuracy and practicality of RefineR for developing population-specific pediatric reference intervals.
Main Methods:
- Collected outpatient laboratory data from 51,863 pediatric patients (under 19 years) between January 2023 and December 2024.
- Derived reference intervals (RIs) for nine common chemistry analytes using both RefineR and CLSI guidelines with bootstrap resampling.
- Compared derived RIs to CALIPER RIs using a flagging system based on 95% confidence intervals and total allowable error (TAE).
Main Results:
- RefineR-derived RIs aligned with CALIPER RIs in 86 out of 88 age- and gender-specific analyte groups.
- CLSI-derived RIs showed alignment in 77 out of 88 groups, indicating lower concordance.
- Discrepancies were noted for specific analytes (e.g., ALT, AST, ALP, BUN), influenced by factors like sample type, BMI, and hydration status.
Conclusions:
- RefineR demonstrated superior alignment with CALIPER RIs compared to CLSI guidelines in a US pediatric outpatient cohort.
- RefineR is a robust and practical method for deriving population-specific pediatric reference intervals, handling mixed data and skewed distributions effectively.
- The RefineR approach aids in verifying the implementation of external RIs, such as CALIPER, in diverse pediatric populations.
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
6.4K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.4K
Data Validation
628
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:
628
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
8.8K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.8K
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
690
Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...
690
Reliability and Validity
13.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.8K
Prediction Intervals
3.3K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
3.3K


