Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 23, 2026

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
Published on: August 22, 2013
Impact of shifting blood donation policy from gift to honour model: staggered difference-in-differences analysis in
Yuhao Liu1, Yiming Pan2,3, Zhoutao Zheng1
1School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Objective:
To evaluate the impact of a new blood donation incentive policy-an honour model promoting blood donation quality and quantity to inform future policy changes in China and worldwide.
Design:
Staggered difference-in-differences analysis in China.
Setting:
Blood donation policies (from provincial government official websites), annual blood donation data (from China's reports on blood safety and annual reports on development of China's blood collection and supply industry), and demographic and socioeconomic indicators (from China city statistical yearbooks and provincial statistical yearbooks) from 2012 to 2018.
Population:
Blood stations from 30 provinces of China; four regions excluded because data not available.
Intervention:
The honour model (social recognition through an honour card granting frequent blood donors honorary incentives such as free access to public bus services and outpatient consultations in hospitals) was piloted to stimulate blood donations in intervention provinces.
Main Outcome Measure:
Annual total count of blood donations and total count of whole blood donations to measure the quantity of blood donations, and annual donor eligibility rate to measure the quality of blood donations.
Results:
The honour model increased blood donation counts by 3.55% (95% confidence interval 1.30% to 5.80%, P=0.003) by the end of the second year of implementation. By the end of the fifth year, this effect had doubled to 7.70% (2.42% to 12.98%, P=0.006). Most of these increases were driven by absolute increases in whole blood donation of 3.34% (1.11% to 5.56%, P=0.005) and 7.23% (1.90% to 12.56%, P=0.01) by the end of the second and fifth years, respectively. The honour model did not significantly affect the donor eligibility rate. The Borusyak-Jaravel-Spiess difference-in-differences analysis, synthetic difference-in-differences analysis, and placebo test all suggested the results were robust.
Conclusions:
The honour model of blood donation increased the quantity of blood donation in China, while donation quality remained unchanged. This impact was sustained after the introduction of the honour model within the study period.
Related Concept Videos
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
Impact of Groups on Groups

